Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />il <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> <br />the ground water, there would be protection to the extent <br />possibie i~y State and Federal laws. <br /> <br />Doug Mamm~- Inquired if Waste Management can be held accountable <br />for the egisting site now? <br /> <br />Mr. LeFev~re - Stated that currently the parent corporation cannot <br />be held accountable; the subsidiary can. <br /> <br />Brenda Ba~erkemper - Referred. to. June 25, 1984 public hearing <br />minutes amd comments by Erzka Smtz regarding cases where the <br />parenti~co~pany has been traced for remedial action. <br /> <br />LeFevere ~ Stated he cannot respond to Ms. Sitz' remarks; that <br />he do~sn'~ know the circumstances of PCA getting back to the <br />parent corporation. <br /> <br />Roger.~ha~ki - 7020 153rd Avenue - There is no guarantee that <br />Waste'Man%gement and parent company, State and Federal agencies <br />will alwa~s be solvent; it could come back to the citizens. <br /> <br />Mr. LeFevere - If all that did happen, the City would have to <br />take Carelof it's own water supply system and the burden would <br /> !City. Local companies will be solvent as long as <br />be on the~ <br />the company is in operation. The permit provides considerably <br />more Protection. <br />Mr. shask~ - What if problems occur 15 years after Waste <br />Management is through with the site? <br />Mr. L~Fev~re - If there is no assistance from Federal, State <br />and CoUnty government, or any other governmental agency; if <br />Waste Management local and international are no longer solvent; <br />if Anoka ~s no longer solvent; then it would fall back on the <br />citizens ~f Ramsey. <br /> <br />Larry Phillips - 6640 153rd Lane NW - Referred to June 25 1984 <br />public hearing minutes, page 14, Erika Sitz comments. <br /> <br /> Chairman ~eterson - Stated that Ms. Sitz'convnents were her~_ <br /> opinions ~nd does not make it law. <br /> <br /> Larry Phillips - Anoka should be stuck with any and future <br /> liabi!iti~s resulting from the landfill. <br /> <br /> Chairman Peterson inquired if Rmmsey has any liabilities if <br /> nothing changes. <br /> <br /> Mr. LeFev~re - Cities have been held liable for negligent <br /> inspection. This would be a fairly remote possibility as <br /> Ramseyi~do~s not monitor or regulate the site. Another <br /> potentiall liability has to do with the fact that Ramsey currently <br /> regards i~self as having property rights in this property <br /> under theicontract with the City of Anoka. If this package goes <br /> through, it is possible that the City will never have legal <br /> title. Il would be concerned that at some future date if people <br /> <br />P & Z/July 3, 1984 <br />Page 5 of ~ <br /> <br /> <br />