Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />CITY OF RAMSEy <br />FINANCIAL ANA~ Y ~ISi <br /> <br />Prepared 5/82 <br /> <br />An analysis of ~he~City of Ramsey's financial trends and projections has been <br />prepared to gUi~e the City in preparing its Capital Improvement Program. The <br />analysis shows Whether. there will be any surplus operating revenue to finance <br />future capital ~mp~ovements and it identifies the previous capital improvement <br />financing resou~.~ ce~ used by the City and future debt repayment obligations. <br />This analysis also,raises some important financial policy issues that the City <br />should considerlsu~h as the levy limitation, aid distribution formula, and <br />fiscal disparit!es~tax formula. <br /> <br /> I. Population GroWth Analysis <br /> <br /> For projection~purposes, three alternative population growth assumptions <br /> have been developed to evaluate the impact on revenue and expenditure pro- <br /> jections. Figure 1 shows how these alternatives were developed. First, <br /> population growth from 1970 to 1980 was graphed. Ramsey's growth during <br /> this periodilwaS over 300%. The percentage increase is extremely high due <br /> to the small base population in 1970, so this percentage may not be used <br /> to project population growth. Furthermore, more than half of this growth <br /> occurred dtU~in~ the 1970-1975 period, with the rate slowing somewhat from <br /> 1975-1980. ~Co~ounded annually, the grow-th rate from 1975-1980 averaged <br /> out to 7.4%Pe~ year, compared to 24% per year from 1970-1975. <br /> <br /> The high population projections assume that the 7.4% per year population <br /> growth rate !~wi~l continue. The medium population projection is based upon <br /> %he Metropo~ita~ Council's projections for Ramsey which if compounded <br /> annually, wOrk~ out to 3.2% per year. The low projection provides for no <br /> population!~ro~-h. The percentage increase in population used to calculate <br /> the 1982 le~y limitation is 1.4%. A turn-around in the economy· such as a <br /> return to 1Ow iDterest rates, would change the population growth back to <br /> the high range <br /> <br />II. .C~eratinq -~e~ven~e and Expenditure Projections <br /> <br /> The City's budggts over the past four years (1978-1981) have been analyzed <br /> to determine the growth trends in revenues and expenditures. This informa- <br /> tion is showgn in Figures 2 and 3. The trends have been used to make operat- <br /> ing revenue andlexpenditure projections for the next five year period to <br /> determine w~ethgr there will be any surplus current revenue to pay for capi- <br /> tal improv~mentM. Previous trends in capital -improvement oriented revenues <br /> and expenditUreS provide a picture of how capital i~mrovements have been <br /> financed in ~helpagt, the debt repayment obligations of the City, and future <br /> likely reven~e <br /> ~ources for capital improvements. <br /> <br /> For 1982, adopted budget figures have been used in addition to estimated <br /> improvements such as street improvements, sealcoating, etc. to establish <br /> the estimated rRnges for revenues and expenditures. <br /> <br /> <br />