My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/03/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 11/03/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:32:54 PM
Creation date
2/25/2004 8:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
11/03/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! Hakanson!Anderson Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> 222 Monroe Street <br />A noka, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />November 3, 1982 <br /> <br />engineers and surveyors <br /> 612/427-5860 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard <br />Ramsey, Minnesota 155303 <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Re: Terry Hendriks~n <br /> Drainage Problem <br /> <br />Dear Council Members: <br /> <br />As requested at.you~ October 26, 1982 council meeting, I have reviewed the facts <br />concerning the above referenc'edproblem. <br /> <br />At your October 26,: 1982 meeting, I stated that at the time of my last communication <br />with the Anoka. County Highway Department, they were still waiting for either an <br />acceptance or rejection by Mr. Hendriksen to their October 4, 1982 offer. Mr. <br />Hendriksen stated that he and his attorney had rejected that offer and that the <br />County was dragging:their feet since they had not attempted further settlement of the <br />problem. <br /> <br />I reviewed thisiproblem with Mr. Bud Redepenning of the Anoka County Highway Depart- <br />ment on October 27,!1982, and he again stated that Mr. Hendriksen had not rejected <br />their last offer. Therefore, Mr. Redepenning was given direction by the County <br />Attorney's offiqe not to do any work to correct the drainage problem. The County <br />Attorney's office assumed that Mr. Hendriksen was seriously considering their last <br />offer since they wege taking so much time. <br /> <br />In review of the statement by Mr. Hendriksen stating that the drainage prablem and <br />the condemnation were two separate issues and the County wanted to solve them <br />together, I foumd this to be incorrect. Mr. Redepenning told me they would be willing <br />to solve the issues~separately but either Mr. Hendriksen or his attorney wanted them <br />solved together. <br /> <br />I have informed Mr.:Hendriksen of my findings and told him he or his attorney should <br />contact the County in regard to their last offer. I also recommended to him that he <br />request that the' drainage problem be solved separately and immediately to alleviate <br />any flooding next spring. <br /> <br />civil · municipal · planning a soils · land surveying <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.