Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # <br /> <br /> INTRODUCE FRANCHISE FEE ORDINANCE <br /> By: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background:; <br /> <br />For the Past s~.veral years, cities have been restricted to varying State mandated levy <br />limitationS. Tills has resulted in severe restrictions on operations of growing cities such as <br />RamSey2 iAt !~e same time the State has reduced the actual dollars received in local <br />govemrrient al.ds. <br /> <br />Finally in thelast few years, the State has begun billing us in additional ways such as fees <br />for PCA~, DNR~ and other State departmental operations and most recently implementation <br />of a sales tax. , <br /> <br />As a result of I[he above, cities have taken the approach of billing for services received by <br />spec[tic iffflivi~tuals or businesses over and above levels received by the general public. As <br />this relates to dtility companies, we allow them to have the exclusive use of a portion of our <br />right,of~ayS.i Currently we have 147.8 miles of right-of-way. At a cost of $10,000/acre <br />this is ~.issetlvalue of $14,336,600. To date, the utilities have not reimbursed the City of <br />Ramse7 for t~e portion of the right-of-ways for which they have received the use. We <br />have also:not billed them for services received when a new utility line or repair of a line <br />occurs,~ it shbuld be noted here that if we need utility lines to move due to a public <br />constmCti0n pfoject such as 153rd Avenue N.W., we will receive a bill. <br /> <br />As a reSglt r,i the above, the City has proposed adoption of a franchise ordinance with <br />Anoka Monit:[pal Electric and Anoka Electric Cooperative. A franchise ordinance currently <br />exists 0ith lV flwest Gas. Within the proposed electric ordinance them is a fee provision in <br />consideration of the rights granted to the electric distributors under the ordinance. The <br />MidweSt Gas ordinance is silent on a possible franchise fee. It is the Staff position that <br />pursuant tO an Attorney General opinion the fee levied upon the gas company is appropriate <br />in exchange f Dr rights received within the franchise. The following are enclosed with this <br />case; <br /> 1) Projected Franchise Fees and Property Tax Received from Fictitious 50 lot <br /> subdivision <br /> 2) 1992 Tax Capacity Comparison of 20 Area Cities <br /> 3) 1992 Tax Capacity Comparison of Minnesota Cities with Populations <br /> Between 10,000 and 20,000 <br /> 4) 1989 Per Capita Expenditures (Excluding Capital Outlay) for Minnesota <br /> Cities with Populations from 10,000 to 20,000 <br /> 5) City Growth Data <br /> 6) North Metro Mayors Tax Capacity Data <br /> 7) Utility Franchise Fee Comparative Date <br /> 8) AEC Monthly Revenues from December 1990 through November 1991 <br /> 9) Midwest Gas Revenues from December 1990 through November 1991 <br /> 10) i Comparison of Standard Residential Charges <br /> 11) ' Proposed Franchise Fee Ordinance <br /> <br />The follOWing information is pertinent to this case: <br /> <br />· 1993 Local Government Aid (LGA) to the City of Ramsey will be $230,799 less <br /> than ihe $446,122 payment received in 1989. In addition to previous cuts, cities <br /> risk losing additional LGA in the December payment for 1992 and for the year of <br /> <br />00 <br /> <br /> <br />