Laserfiche WebLink
Scenario #1: <br /> <br />Resi <br />~ecoi <br /> <br />lent requests inspection in an O/W infection <br />~mended. <br /> <br /> EXHIBIT "B" <br />area but no control work <br /> <br />The City eolleqts a ?30 O/W suppression application fee. <br />(O/W suppreSsiOn cSntractor will respond to all tree calls in an identified O/W infection area) If the <br />City recommends tilat O/W suppression activity not occur for whatever reason, the H/O's $30 is <br />still matched btit $3t is paid back to the H/O. <br /> <br />In the above inStanCe, th,~ contractor will bill the City $20 for inspections not involving the plow <br />line marking~ ~tc. The remaining" $10 ($30 from H/O, $30 from CSP funds equal $60, minus <br />$20 to contractor a4nd $30 back to H/O leaves $10) will defray the cost of record keeping and <br />administration and.c~onclusion of the H/O's specific information into the City's forestry data base. <br /> <br />Scenario #2: Call.4 not in an oak wilt suppression area. <br /> <br />The City's tree inspector will inspect site. <br /> <br />If oak wilt is identified, this constitutes an oak wilt survey, which is not eligible for a CSP match. <br />This visit !W. oui~! be eligible if any suppression activity occurs during this <br />inspection such as the City's tree inspector marking wilted trees and subsequent <br />control workI: ocOurring. <br /> <br /> ; <br /> <br /> <br />