Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br />ON.~ALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALES LIQUOR <br />LICENSE REQUEST OF DRUM'S ON THE RUM, INC. <br /> By: Mike Auspos, Police Chief <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Drum's on the Rum, Inc., has applied for a transfer ownership of the liquor license at McDuf£s <br />Eatery and, Pub fr~m RRM Enterprises, Inc. This license is an On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday <br />Sales licens¢~ T~e applicant proposes to keep the trade name as McDuffs and the premises <br />remains 16({59 St.iFrancis Boulevard N.W. <br /> <br />I have receive~ from the applicant documentation required by City ordinance that shows the taxes <br />have been paid thy~ugh the first half of 1992 and they have submitted a financial statement that has <br />been revie~ve,,tl b~ the City Attorney and found to be adequate. The remodeling plans for the <br />premises show an, expansion of the dining area and no apparent change in the bar area. The <br />applicant hasipaid the $250.00 investigation fee and I have determined that the officers of the <br />corporation have nO liquor related criminal convictions. The required liquor liability insurance is to <br />be in effect:al thefdate of Council consideration of the license, per the carrier, and I will have <br />documentafiOri to ~at effect on that date. <br /> <br />The license fee has been paid for the 1992-1993 period by RRM Enterprises, Inc., the former <br />owners of lth6 business. When Jimmy B's American Cafe and Lounge was sold and became <br />Lally's on lOthe.~ity agreed, since the license fee had been paid for the license year already, that <br />Jimmy B's and La~ly's could work out their own deal on payment to each other. As far as the City <br />was coneemefl th~ fee was paid. I told Mr. Dom of RRM and Mr. Drum of Drum's on the Rum <br />that I woUld!P~eseflt this same scenario to the Council for consideration on July 28, 1992. ff this is <br />not acceptable to (?.ouncil, then Drum's would pay a $4,200.00 fee, or a pro-rated fee very close to <br />that, and ,the' ~ty ~ould refund to RRM the balance of the fee they paid June 30, 1992. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />I see no Problems With issuing an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales license to Drum's <br />on the Rum, Ific. a,,nd recommend that this be done. <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to app~ve[disapprove granting an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales license to <br />Drum's on the Rum, Inc. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Motion to d~r¢ct [§at Mr. Dom of RRM Enterprises, Inc. and Mr. Drum of Drum's on the Rum, <br />Inc. work out'paYment to each other with regard to the license fee. <br /> <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />- or - <br /> <br />Motion to direct that Mr. Drum of Drum's on the Rum, Inc. will pay a pro-rated liquor license fee <br />and that the City rgfund to RRM Enterprises, Inc. the balance of the fee they paid June 30, 1992. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Police Chief <br />City Administrator ~ <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Finance Officer <br />City Attorney ~ <br /> <br />CC: 07/28/92 <br /> <br /> <br />