Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> ':ENGINEERING <br /> By: <br /> <br />Backgroundi <br /> <br /> CASE <br /> <br />SERVICES FOR WOOD POND PROJECTS <br />Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />On August 27~ 1991, the City awarded engineering work for Wood Pond Projects to Hakanson <br />Anderson ASsdcia~s. The work encompassed extending a deep sanitary interceptor sewer adjacent <br />to <br />wetland ~r ~e g~neral project area and the installation of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer <br />and street imp~ove4nents within the four subdivisions. The construction took place under three <br />separate ¢ontra~ts v~ith a total construction cost of approximately $1.4 million. <br />In requesting ~gi~eering proposals for these projects, the City requested a not-to-exceed price for <br />basic engineering 4ervices and an hourly rate along with an estimate of the total cost required for <br />technical coasgrue~on services. The basis of award was made upon the not-to-exceed price for <br />basic engineering sgrvices, as it is recognized that the technical construction services required can <br />vary with the Contractor, the weather and other factors which are difficult to estimate. As this <br />project is dra~vinl~ to a close, the invoices from Hakanson Anderson Associates for basic <br />engineering se vi~s is at 99% of the $54,775 not-to-exceed price submitted in their proposal. The <br />invoices for:h )uriy services has exceeded the estimated cost of $81,650 by $13,897 with the <br />project 99% ~,.o replete. <br /> <br />The City's COn a'ael[ual agreement with the engineer calls for payment for the number of hours <br /> deal., pin these hourly services and is not limited by the estimate. <br />actually e~:e] roviding <br />Nonetheless,'t~ ar~ount by which the actual hours exceeded the estimate are significant and I have <br />requested: an e:;pl~ation by the engineer. A letter from the engineer in response to this request is <br />enclosed. In' r~vie4ving this letter, the excess cost is attributable solely to staking. Actually, the <br />inspection servtees We slightly below the number of hours estimated. <br /> <br />I believe ~e n~tti~e contained in Mr. Raatikka's letter describes the various elements which were <br />responsible f0f[.the ~ditional work and consequently the additional cost, and I will have an exhibit <br />at the meeting I~o ill0strate the specific areas which are generally referenced in the letter. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />The agreemen~witlj the engineer specified compensation for these particular services on an hourly <br />basis and I b¢l,!.evelthe hours submitted for billing are accurate and reasonable for the amount of <br />service actua!l~t rendered. I therefore recommend payment of $18,878.45 in invoices which were <br />removed from ~the:lune 23, 1992 City Council meeting invoices for Improvement Projects 4~'91-13 <br />and 4~91-14. <br /> <br /> sr <br />Council ActiOn: <br /> <br />Motion to app~°ve ipayment of invoices to Hakanson Anderson Associates for services rendered <br />for Improvern~t ~ojects ~91-13 and ~91-14 in the amount of $18,878.45. <br /> <br />Reviewed By: : <br /> <br />City Adrninistr~tor <br />Finance Offioer <br />City Engineer ~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CC:07/14/92 <br /> <br />9'7 <br /> <br /> <br />