My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/14/1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1992
>
Agenda - Council - 07/14/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:01:05 AM
Creation date
2/25/2004 11:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/1992
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I----'~ Hakanson <br /> Anderson <br /> Assoc., Inc. <br /> <br />222 Monroe Street <br />Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br />6 [ 2/427- 5860 <br />Fax 6i 2/427-3401 <br /> <br />July 9, 1992 <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Jankowski <br />City Engineer <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />Billing of Field Services <br />Improvement Projects 91-13 and 91-14 <br /> <br />Dear Steve: <br /> <br />As requested, we have reviewed our billing of field services for <br />Improvement Projects 91-13 and 91-14. <br /> <br />Since the projects overlapped, the costs should be combined as one <br />project for comparing the estimated cost versus actual costs. <br />Following is a comparison of the estimated staking and inspection <br />costs to the actual billed cost: <br /> <br />Estimated Billed <br /> <br />Staking <br />Inspection <br />Totals: <br /> <br />$33,950.00 <br />$47,700.00 <br />$81,650.00 <br /> <br />$53,911.93 <br />$43,500.30* <br />$97,412.23, <br /> <br />*Included bill of $1,864.42 for testing by STS Consultants, Ltd. <br /> <br />In reviewing the actual billed costs to the estimated costs, and <br />subtracting the STS bill from our billing, our billing exceeds our <br />estimated cost by $13,897.81. <br /> <br />There are a number of reasons why our actual costs exceeds our <br />estimated costs. One of the main reasons was a change in the scope <br />as outlined in your August 2, 1991 request for proposals. Your <br />request for proposals sated that streets and lateral utilities were <br />to be provided for approximately 75 lots and estimated street <br />length to be installed was 4,400 feet. The actual number of lots <br />fully developed was 106 and the total street length built was <br />approximately 6,300 feet. These increases alone would result in an <br />increase in field services of $10,234. <br /> <br />Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.