Laserfiche WebLink
may become necessary. As for the trail segment, there is very little Trott Brook Trail property that <br />has been acquired at this point. I see no immediate urgency to acquire the segment of trail that is <br />planned for through the Smith property. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your review: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br /> <br />g) <br />h) <br />i) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Certificate of survey <br />Memo by Jim Gromberg dated May 23, 1991 <br />Board of Adjustment case cover sheet dated May 23, 1991 <br />Board of Adjustment public hearing and regular meeting minutes dated May 23, 1991 <br />Board of Adjustment Findings of Fact #0298 <br />City Council meeting minutes dated May 28, 1991 <br />Proposed City Council findings of fact <br />Proposed variance <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />I recommend adopting City Council findings of fact similar to those adopted by the Board of <br />Adjustment with the following exceptions: a) Amend #10 to indicate that if granted, the variance <br />will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Zoning Chapter. b) Add a finding to <br />indicate that the applicant is requesting access to the property from the only location where street <br />frontage is available, c) Add a finding indicating that the request for a variance was denied by the <br />Board of Adjustment on May 23, 1991. d) Add a finding that the applicants approached the City <br />Council during Citizen Input on May 28, 1991 and without the benefit of case documentation to <br />review, the Council affirmed the decision of the Board of Adjustment. e) Add a finding indicating <br />that on July 14, 1992, City Council agreed to waive the 10 day appeal time frame and review the <br />records of the case. f) Add a finding to indicate that the Applicants have stated that they are <br />willing to locate the dwelling on the property so as not to obstruct the future extension of 171st <br />Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />I recommend granting the variance if the Smiths are agreeable to the terms of the variance as <br />proposed and any additional terms developed by City Council. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Adopt Resolution g92-07- adopting Findings of Fact #. relating to Tim and Brenda <br />Smith's request for an appeal to the May 23, 1991 decision of the Board of Adjustment <br />relating to their request for a variance to street frontage requirements. <br /> <br />-and- <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Adopt Resolution #92-07- approving Tim and Brenda Smith's request for a variance to <br />street frontage requirements based on Findings of Fact # and declaring terms of the <br />variance. <br /> <br />-OF- <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Deny Tim and Brenda Smith's request for a variance to street frontage requirements. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />CC: 7/14/92 <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />