Laserfiche WebLink
Desci'ibed },~re, are t. hre'e types of' oak wi]it connro] pro,rams that <br />could be i~ll,]emellLed v,'~Lhill the c~ty of ~amsey. <br /> <br />Opt i o~ ~ <br /> <br />No Pr'o~rnm~ <br /> <br />in I t~ie; oPtJ o~ i. bere is no input by the city. All <br />J~;stmc't:ionl/contro] ~'equests are maae bN the homeowner to qualified <br />Foro~:L:,> don~t~lt, at~t~, a~d homeow]~ers ~ssume a]] costs, it is <br /> <br />Funds a~'e ~ ~x'ta ) ] ab] e', t. hFotlgb 1. he BWCS usJ nq MFIP funding .- The <br />I'~ciJ~ ~' for ;this pr'ogr'am comes from the same pool (S250,000) <br />gr'an~,c,d to 1he s:tahe bN the USFS. Approx~mate!N $60,000 i.s slated <br />f'o]' ali of Ar~oka countN. These funds Are assessed as a 50/50 cost <br />share Fo~ bndfividua] property owners. Property size muse gene~aZ}y <br />t,e ;~ acres or ]~'geT'. <br /> <br />.\/)VANTAGEg <br /> <br /> ,cost to city, <br />.i . No d:i,['Cnct~' <br /> No adm';nJ~tratJve cost, <br />3. ha} ~]lo~' ~-eri,aJn high visibility areas, or vocal individuals to <br /> [,e apPeas~id . <br /> <br />D ]. SAI)VANTAGEs <br /> <br />] . No input from city. <br />2, Does n~t alloy for adaptation to codes or control zones. <br />3. VerN iSmited funds would be spent in the city. <br />4. Small lots will be ].eft out. <br />5. These f'undls will. be dispersed to munic' ~' <br /> zp~._~, prosrams first, Funds <br /> left over wi. ii ~o t.~, SX~CS, <br /> <br /> <br />