Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />BackgroUnd:, <br /> <br />REPORT FROM NEGOTIATING <br /> By: Kay McAIoney, Personnel <br /> <br />COMMITTEE <br />Coordinator <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />A Negotiating Committee meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. on April 14, 1992 at Ramsey City <br />Hall with ~. oui~eilmembers Beyer, Hardin and Peterson in attendance. The purpose of the <br />meeting w~is to[discuss 1992 wages and benefits for exempt employees. <br /> <br />City Admihistrator Schroeder explained the plan to the exempt employees that were present <br />stating Cit~ Co.flncil's intent to include performance, length of position tenure and internal <br />class and ~xte~,nal market comparisons. Employees then asked questions and voiced <br />concerns ~gar4ing the plan. <br />Another mgetirlg has been scheduled for May 12, 1992 at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the 1992 <br />wages and berie~fits for exempt employees. It was agreed that the exempt employees will <br />receive mo__ ~!e information, and answers to the their questions prior to the scheduled meeting. <br />A Negotiating d2ommittee meeting was held at 4:00 p.m. on April 21, 1992 at Ramsey City <br />Hall withid, oun~ilmembers Beyer, Hardin and Peterson in attendance. The purpose of the <br />meeting wa to ~liscuss 1992 wages and benefits for the AFSCME bargaining unit. <br /> <br />City Adrair istr~tor Schroeder explain the City Council's rationale for the rejection of the <br />latest AFS~ .'MI~ proposal. The proposal was rejected because it did not include any <br />consideration for performance. It was also market driven without the primary <br />consideraii{in b~ing internal comparison as mandated by the State's comparable worth law. <br />The Negoti~itingiCommittee resubmitted the management plan. <br />The AFSC~t~)rgaining unit has scheduled a meeting for April 30, 1992 and will let City <br />Administm~r S~hroeder know their decision on May 1, 1992. <br />Recomme.fldaiions: <br />To apProve lhe r~ecommendations of the Personnel Committee. <br />Council A~cti°n: <br />Motion to'a~}pro~e/not approve the recommendations of the Personnel Committee. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />City Admini{Strat0r <br />Personnel COordinator <br /> <br />CC:04/28/92 <br /> <br /> <br />