Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />JAMES M ~,AHONEY <br />KENNETH CLEARON <br />DALI: {~ LINDMAN <br />GARY C PELTER <br /> <br />RANGE S HELD <br />MARK J MAN~RFELD <br /> <br />MAil'NEY, DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY <br /> PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION <br /> ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS <br /> <br /> 801 PARK AVENUE <br /> MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404-1189 <br /> <br /> PHONE (612) 339-5863 <br /> TELECOPIER {612) 339-1529 <br /> <br />,r <br /> <br />INCLUDING THE PRACTICE OF <br /> MILLER & NEARY <br /> <br />November 26, 1991 <br /> <br />i, HY-10 Ramsey 4th Addition <br /> <br />;e represents James and Rita Amble, the owners of the <br /> presently zoned as an Industrial ("I") District <br /> is considering rezoning to a Rural Industrial <br />.ct. <br /> <br />Ms. Sylvia Fr~lik <br />Zoning Ad~ ~£~trator <br />City of <br />15153 NoW~en tBoulevard N.W. <br />Ramsey, MN~ 5!303 <br /> <br />Re: PIN ii~-3 ~, 25-11-0 010 <br /> Our ~1e.I%91-4750-09 <br />Dear Ms. rP~Ol'~k: <br /> Our ~J <br /> <br />above <br />which <br />("R-I") <br /> <br /> In <br />the proper <br />storage <br />the PrOP <br />surface <br />present <br />amply con~: <br /> <br /> '~ce upon the zoning at that time, the Ambles purchased <br /> July 6, 1989 for $25,000 to use as an outdoor <br /> ty for their business. At the time of its purchase, <br /> a cornfield which the Ambles have had to grade, <br /> ~=ence at a total additional cost of $23,700. The <br /> of the property consists of grass and gravel which <br /> dust. When they first purchased the lot, the Ambles <br />applied permit to construct a pole barn for inside storage <br />but this i ~as refused. Now, the City is trying to limit outdoor <br />storage ~1 as allowed the construction of a pole Darn on a <br />neighDorih. :operty. <br /> <br /> As know, a "supply yard" is a permitted use in an "I" <br />District i~Dde~ ~ 9.21.26 suDd. 2(e) of the zoning ordinance. For <br />our purpo~S .=s ,=} the major difference in the Rural Industrial zoning <br />ordinanc~ is Ithat a supply yard is not a permitted use. If the <br />rezoning~!~.=re~ to take place as proposed, the Ambles would be left <br />with two i¢loi~es if they wished to continue using the property as a <br />supply ya~r, : ~ <br /> <br /> C~o n t i n u e t h e i r o p e r a tion as a <br /> I n <br /> lonconforming use wi th the requisi te <br /> ii u~certaintyt, of that status; or <br /> <br /> ~ ~ I CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. <br /> <br />]'HOMAS S McEACRRON' <br />· .qANDRA S FERRIAN <br />DAWN G ATCHISON <br />'~HOMA$ E MARSHALL <br />GREGORY A ZINN <br />VICTOR E LUND <br />SANDRA J GROVE' <br /> <br />G P MAHONEY <br />G.J ~,4AHONE Y <br />R.J NEARY 1191~.1984) <br /> <br /> <br />