07/23/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #92-07- A RES~LU'~'ION ADOPTING FINDINGS. OF FACT # RELATING TO A REQUE$~ F~_R A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT ACCE-'~ORY STRUCTURES NEARER ~HEiFRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON TH~ P[IROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN 8301 163RD AVENUE N.W. 1. That Mr. Daniel Brehm, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a Boar~ of ~djustment variance from Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code to construct an aCCessOry garage and a storage building nearer the front property line than the principal struc~re Bn the property generally known as 8301 163rd Avenue N.W. and legally desedbed i~s follows: Lo~t 6, Block 4, Oakridge Estates, Anoka Count3,, Minnesota 2. That l~e/~pplicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to Seclioni9.03.05 of the Ramsey City Code on July 23, 1992 and that said public hearing was P ~ope~ly advertised and that the minutes of said public' hearing are hereby incorporated as a p rt of these findings by reference. 3. That t~e s~bject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 2.5 acres in size;[ That ~er st~bject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. That Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code does not permit the construction of acces~ry Structures nearer the front property line than the principal structure. That t~e p~ncipaI structure on the subject property is located approximately 250 feet from the fr ,6nt p~operty.,, line. That ~e ~pplicant is proposing to construct an accessory garage approximately 100 feet from the f~ont property line and a mini-storage building approximately 190 feet from the front ~t~op~rty line. 8. That t tere~re unique circumstances applying ~,o the subject property that do not generally apply o o~er properties in the district; namel5, that the developer of the lot has created a 250 fc ~t front yard setback by the placement of the home; that the side and rear yards of the subj¢c: prclperty are not acceptable locations for accessory structures due to sharp declines in tOl~ gra0hy, trees, wetlands, septic system location and wetlands. That ~e sPecial conditions causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the Appli{ant ~s the home was platted and constructed on the property by persons other than the Ap~ lieant. 10. That t~he A~pplicant has submitted a petition signed by five (5) area ,r~id,e~ts stating no object~n tp the Applicants proposal for construction of an accessor5 =ara~,e and storage building. 11.. That samlar variances have been granted in the R-1 Rural Residential district in the City of Rams~¢'. o