11/05/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. That t~ e e isting garage on the property is 720 square feet; the shed is 400 square feet; the proPoSed ttccessory garage is 640 square feet; for a total garage and accessory building space ~f 1,1760 square feet; the maximum garage and accessory building space permitted for a 10 a~re 'Iht is 5,664 square feet. That ~;ectlon 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code does not permit the construction of acees~ry Structures nearer the front property line than the principal structure. Thai; t~e p~ncipal structure on the subject property is located approximately 300 feet from the tS'o~nt p,l'operty line. That ~he ~pplicant is proposing to construct an accessory garage approximately 200 feetSffom lhe front property line. That t lere [are unique circumstances applying to the subject property that do not generally apply :o °~er properties in the district; namely, that the side and rear yards of the subject propel t3' agte consumed by wetlands and mature tree growth. That fl~e s~ecial conditions causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the Appli~: ant ~.s the home was sited and constructed on the property by persons other than the AppliC ants~ Thatsimil~ variances have been granted in the R-1 Rural Residential district in the City of Rams{iy. I That tlr ie variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. That t~e sUCh variance is/is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right simiia~:~to t~hat possessed by other properties in the R-1 Rural Residential District. That i~, gra~ted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denicdi;to O~her owners of lands, structures or buildings in the same district. That ~ gra~ted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Rams~ Zdning Chapter or other property in the R- 1 Rural Residential District. ~gr ~ ted, the variance wrll/w~ll not substantmll5 xncrease the congesnon of pubt~c That i ~ .... , ' . ' ' streets~ or ~gcrease the dan~er of fire, or endanger the pubhc safer), or substantially impair prop,r~y v~ues within the ~eighborhood. The motion fo~ the iadoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote bein~ taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following v~ted against the same: