01/08/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #2: [iAi~endment of Chapter 7 of the City code Regarding Charitable .!~G~mbling City Admmis[ramr Schroeder stated that at the July 23, 1991 Council meeting, an ordinance amending Cit~.~ erode Sections 7.61 and 7.62 regarding charitable gambling and bingo was introduced. ~jnq¢ then the C~ty has become aware of a couple of State Statute changes which impact this o~n~ce. The first is the maximum rental fee and the second is the amount that can ~ charged for:~ investigation fee. Motion by C0un~dmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Peterson to reintroduce Ordinance :~-~X amending Section 7.61 entitled "Chahtable Gambling" and Section 7.62 City entitl~ "Bing~" df, the: Ramsey Code. Motion c~e~. yoting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Hardin and Peterson. Voting No: None, Abse~'~: Councilmembers Beyer and Cich. Case fi3: (:A~plicalion for Liquor License by V.It. Enterprises, Inc.; Case of ~,lo~l Lalley Mayor Gll~on~turned the meeting over to Councilmember Peterson. Police Chief ~u~P°s stated that all the requirements for the liquor license request by V.H. Ente~dses, In~. ~ve ~en met. He stated that the ordinance requires the license fee to be paid by the applicant g t~e time of the application, but since this is a transfer, the license is actually paid through June, ~1992. . [ ~:~ . Morion by C~ng~lmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Peterson to approve the transfer of thSofik~ale intoxicating liquor license and Sunday sales license from S.J.S., Inc. to V.H. Ente~d~esj~ Inc. Motion ca~i~, ~Voting Yes: Councilmembers Hardin and Peterson. Voting No: None. Abstained: ~M~y&Dilbertson. Absent: Councilmembers Bever and Cich. Councilmem~ P~terson turned the meeting back over to Mayor Gil~nson. Case g4: ~C~ange Order No. i and Final Payment for 1991 Street Sealcoating ['P~°gram City Engineer Jahkowski stated that the City of Ramsey aw~ded its 1991 Street Sealcoating Program to Bi':uffiinous Roadways, Inc. in the amount of $34,761.43. The award was based upon · il estimated qua! tlt!~,s of bituminous and sealcoating ag~egate. The actual amoum of bituminous used was twa percent higher than the estimate. Mr. 3ankowski stated that in addition, the contractor off :re lithe City a reduced phce for the use of City owned aggregate which was stockpiled at en ml Park. The City took advantage of this and approximately 60 percent of the total ag~egatd~us :d on the project was supplied ~om this stock pile. He explained that since the contract b~d -~as .bna unit price basis, the con,actor should be compensated accordingly. The Change Order ?eft:ets a net decrease of $6,070.92 based on the actual amounts of matehals used. Motion by CoO nci)mem~r H~din and seconded by Councilmem~r Peterson to authorize Change Order No, 1 and final payment to the con,actor in the full amount of the revised con~act price of $28,690.51. ', Motion ca~ied ~otin~ Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Hardin and Peterson. Votin~ No: None. A~sefit.: C~uncilmem~ers. Beverand Cich. ~ City Council/November 12, 1991 Page 4 of 5