|
1991 TOTAL EARNINGS
<br />
<br />:' .:i'~:i':~:.ii., ~otal,:i;:'~::!~ii~!:: :1991 Wages':~s~.~a::;:!1991::-Wages::;as:.;a
<br />: ' :!.;i::~: ii~ii'i'!i'::"! i~:':i' ·: "~'.!'¢!?i- :: :.~":'!;i '":, ' '~::;iil;::..i~ ': !::" %': "!:" 'i:":'-::h.: ::: .',, :; .:~'.:; :'~'""~"'~%:.:ii'::":i::!i~ :!'!:.:.:'i:.: :;:; ' .":'"::'i'"' · '!"~':~:
<br />: ....... . ........ :: :~.,~,.~i....:..:: ~:9 9..1.. :~:,:::~::?.. ::..'/.,,:,of:-9!: mdpt:::::~.:~..Yo ,.0f-'. 9~.::mclpt:::.:. :~,~ ..o .:-92 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
<br />:::'Em. p IO'Yefe i~!~¢i,~;~:~:,.. :' :, ' ~Agi~$.;~;;;;;:,;-:'.:;~t, : :.'!'.91 ::c as~.:i~::!::i~ii;~:~.t;::.:~92;~ic~.~.~.~i:~;::~i~i~ia~;;:i~9:1:~;:i:;c~asse~;~i:.:.::~iiii;~;i;i~a~:;!i~:.~92~;;~~ . . as~b~::.ii;i::!::::. ..
<br />.Auspos : '$49,324 113.84% 113.847o 117.95% 117.95%
<br />;Hellin9 '[ !: ~;44,769 93.49% 98.16% 92.60% 99.57%
<br />Gustafson i i$44,027 I ,
<br />,Mevissen i f~43,706 { 112.75% 112.75% 120.84% 120.84%
<br />Jankowski ~! ;}$43,508 I 90.86% 100.42%! 89.99% 104.05%
<br />Way I , ;:~..42656 i I
<br /> "r $.42,165 j
<br />Balabon . .~
<br />Singewald i '.$41,569
<br />Kuhn [ !$41 049
<br />Arneson i'
<br />Erdman ~
<br />Dwyer I :i$35,792
<br />Keefe .I I531,870 82.21% 82.21% 88.12% 88.12%
<br />Stenquist ~ ~¢31,662 115.71% 138.86% 125.84% 145.49%
<br />Boos 'i' .;$.30,688, 89.72% 84.11% 98.10% 91.24%
<br />Gomez . r, '1530,261 78.06% 82.94% 83.67% 89.97%
<br />Huff .,, 29,524 86.31% 76.16%i 94.38% 81.63%
<br /> ' i$29,506 86.26% 92.42%I 94.33% 101.43%
<br />F roll k i - ~!~26,944 90.89% 84.40% 99.59% 92.62%
<br />Ott ~.
<br />Gromberg . ; i[$26,808 90.43% 90.43% 99.09% 99.09%
<br />Schroeder'* ':
<br />McAIoney r ~$26,472 89.30% 72.55% 97.85% 78.70%
<br /> rr' i!$25,669 102.34% 112.57% 109.70% 117.95%
<br />Talbot i ""$24,015 95.75% 105.32% 102.63% 110.35%
<br />Riemer
<br />Johnson, D. ', !$23,838 I 74.67% 74.67%1 81.94% 81.94%
<br />Stafford i: i$~3,627 I 86.35% 103.62% 93.90% 108.57%
<br /> i'
<br />Lutmer i ',i$22,585 90.04% 90.04% 96.52%1 96.52%
<br /> 1
<br />Lacey -r j$21,100 j 84.12% 92.54% 90.17%l 96.96%
<br />Rogers I ii$20,836I 83.07% 83.07%1 89.04%' 89.04%
<br />Johnson, K. .i: 'rl$19'925 I 87.38%j 97.07%1 91.56%! 98.45%
<br />Thieling ~ ~$19,791I 78.91%1 72.33%1 84.58% 78.66%
<br />Bray i ;;$18,096 88.17%1 88.17%i 89.42% 89.42%
<br />R_ybak .i~ I $r17,735 86.42%1 77.78%! 87.63%l 81.50%
<br />Aaseby , i'.$~ 17,710 86.29%I 77.67%I 87.51%j 81.38%
<br />Buntje" -r :',$18,289 89.11% 80.21% 90.37%I 84.04%
<br />Bacon' ii~23,092 92.07%1 77.90°/ol 98.68°/ol 85.35°/°
<br />Swendsen' ~ 1526,213 I 88.43%1 104.51%1 96.89%1 112.02%
<br />Belsaas" ~ ;i$~16,872 I 67.27°/o I 73.99%1 72.10%I 77.53%
<br />Lueck*' iI ~:$23 336 i I
<br /> ~$1;;160,333 i . I
<br />Exempt ~ :: I 93.51%i 92.17%i 98.38% 97.80%
<br />AFSCME ~ " t 88.20% 90.63%i
<br /> ~ 94.1 9%, 96.10%
<br />
<br />· not empl0, y~d. f. ull-time (annual salary FTE) i
<br />" not em. ploY(~d '.!DII year of 1991 (annual salary FTE) i
<br />
<br />
<br />
|