Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # 4 <br /> <br /> ~ ~PROCESSING, INC.; CASE OF MR. DAN KARST By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> r <br />Background:~ <br /> <br />~. D~ K~sl h~l ~ppli~ for site pl~ review to cons~ct a 13,~ squm f~t buil~ng on Lots 2 <br />and 3, Block ~, ~iteway No~ Indus~al Plat g2. The pu~ose of the buil~ng is to provide <br />~fion~ indl ~ ~pace for ~e prep~afion of least.k, inclu~g ~e ~s~sembly of engines and <br />~ans~ssions, an~[ind~r storage ~ea for other types of metes proposed to be receivM at the <br />facili~. ~ . <br /> <br />~e follo~ng ~s ~ enclos~ for yo~ info~afion: <br /> <br /> ~ Sl~l~auon map <br /> b) ~Site~pl~ <br /> c) ;Ci~ S~f Review letter ~t~ Au~st 27, 1992 <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The building ~ ~Opos~ to be l~ated on the comon lot line between Lots 2 and 3. ff the site <br />plan is apprO~d[~ ~. ~st would ~cord a lot combination at Anoka County. ~e building is <br />within the mlxi~um lot coverage allowed when ~ing ~e total ~ea of Lots 2 and 3 into <br />cons~derano~,~; ~ s~c~e ~s propos~ to be a con.ere bl~k cons~ction; some inte~ation of <br />color or mx~o~ ~e exterior fac~g would be deskeable. <br /> <br />~e propO~l~afion of the s~cture meem ~1 setbacks except that it would en~oach on the re~ <br />y~d setbaek by ~pproximately 4 feet. ~. K~st should be direct~ to decrease the size of the <br />s~cmre or a~l~[or a vm~ce. <br /> · <br /> <br />To ad.ess s~e~ing and landscaping, ~. K~st is proposing a 10 foot high wood ~d met~ <br />fence borde~: b~ ~lack:~ ~ ~ls S~ce ~es Mjacent m Basflt S~ee[ <br />~e sim p~ ~tes provi~ng for 11 off-s~eet p~g spaces, which is ~ compli~ce wi~ Ciw <br />Code requkomeg~s. All ~veways, m~euvefing me~ and off-s~eet p~ng meas would be <br />paved ~d c~.r <br /> <br />Although ~.~K~t would prefer to de~elop ~e site with city sewer ~d water ~d paved s~eeu, it <br />doesn't aPpe~ thfi: 't a suffi~ent number of the other benefitting property owners in the ~ea ~e <br />interested in:~p~fioning for those improvements at this time. Based on that, Mr. Karst is <br />develop~g ~ ~:and 3 with on-site utilities. <br /> ; <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />City St~f r~en~ site pl~ approvfl contingent upon ~e app~c~t appl~ng for a v~ce to <br />· e m~ ~d $eth~k r~ukemen[ <br /> <br /> Commission Action: <br /> <br /> R~m~nd that City Council ~ant site plan approvfl to Mr. K~st s proposal for a <br /> s~e~[9n ~ts 2 ~d 3, Block 4, Gateway No~ Indus~fl Pink Plat ~2 contingent upon <br /> comp~ee with Ciw S~f review leaer dat~ August 27, I992. <br /> <br />Review Ch¢ctdi~t: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />City Engineer <br />Zoning Administrator <br />9/1/92 <br /> <br />71 <br /> <br /> <br />