#15-01-003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

27. That the Applicant does have a current Retail Mobile Food Handler license, issued by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 28. That all structures shall comply with all applicable codes, including, but not limited to, building, fire and zoning. 29. That the City finds the Home Occupation operates beyond the parameters of general and administrative home occupation permit requirements (117-351) and therefore requires Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. 30. That the City finds that the Home Occupation does not operate beyond the intent and parameters of 117-351 (Home Occupations) and finds that the Home Occupation is low-level even though it is not a use typically found in a residential area. 31. That the Applicant has stated the Home Occupation is only temporary until an affordable commercial site is found. 32. That on December 5, 2014, in accordance with Minnesota Statute 15.99, the City issued a letter to Applicant stating that the City was invoking a sixty (60) day extension to the sixty (60) day time limit for reviewing and commenting on the application. 33. That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 34. That the proposed use will be compatible with the residential neighborhood. 35. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 36. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market value of neighboring properties. 37. That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 38. That the proposed use will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as highways and streets. 39. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 40. That the proposed use will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Kuzma, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Strommen Councilmember Johns Councilmember Kuzma Councilmember LeTourneau Councilmember Riley Councilmember Shryock Councilmember Williams RESOLUTION #15-01-003 Page 3 of 4