Laserfiche WebLink
Fourth, Anoka County has indicated that it has secured commitments from the Counties <br />Transit Improvement Board (CTIB) for at least one additional transit access grant along <br />TH 10 in the City of Ramsey. An existing $10 million transit access grant is part of the <br />funding package for the Armstrong Interchange project to be constructed this year. The <br />County has proposed using the additional transit access dollars to create railroad <br />underpasses under the BNSF mainline in Ramsey at either Sunfish Blvd (CR 57) or the <br />Ramsey Blvd (CR 56). It is possible to create underpasses at these locations because of <br />the distance between the rail corridor and the highway. CTIB funding for an underpass <br />could be available as early as 2016. As the City's preferred priority, the Ramsey Blvd <br />improvement would be significantly easier and less expensive to build and would support <br />additional development in the COR and along the south side of TH 10. Building the <br />underpass however and not simultaneously building the interchange would make both the <br />underpass and the interchange more expensive and would double the inconvenience and <br />disruption to the public. <br />Finally, the success of the Armstrong interchange improvement effort has created <br />awareness, momentum, and an effective community support network all of which is <br />poised to be focused now on Ramsey Blvd. As a recipient of a federal TIGER grant, TH <br />10 has established it's eligibility for federal funding assistance. The same is true at the <br />state level as a result of Armstrong's success in attracting both a MnDOT Corridor <br />Investment Management Strategy grant and a legislatively guided and funded Local Road <br />Improvement grant. The attendance at the City's Armstrong appreciation event also <br />demonstrated a very high level of awareness of the issues affecting the performance of <br />TH 10 in Ramsey and the existence of a strong, influential base of community support for <br />additional efforts to make improvements in the corridor. <br />In and of themselves however these opportunities cannot be expected to independently <br />generate similar successes in the future unless they are taken advantage of in a strategic <br />and intentional way. To do so, I would propose the following steps. <br />1) Comprehensive information resources should be developed supporting the need <br />and justification for the improvement of the Ramsey Blvd rail crossing and TH 10 <br />interchange. The resources would underscore the issues of safety, congestion, and <br />economic development as well as the broader benefit to the performance of the <br />overall corridor. Community support groups which were involved in the Armstrong <br />effort would be encouraged to use these resources to build awareness and support for <br />Ramsey Blvd improvements. <br />2) Legislation would be introduced requesting a $5 million appropriation for the <br />Ramsey Blvd interchange improvement. This legislation would mirror legislation <br />introduced for Armstrong during the 2014 session and would provide a vehicle for <br />communicating legislative support for the project. In the end, as with Armstrong, <br />transportation funding legislation rarely includes specific projects but the process can <br />be very helpful in creating an environment where funding from a variety of possible <br />sources can be discussed and hopefully brought to the table. The development and <br />implementation of this legislative strategy could also provide a context for supporting <br />