Laserfiche WebLink
Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama described the pros and cons of <br />three access alternatives: a cul -de -sac (not supported by staff); realigning Krypton Street to <br />connect to Nowthen Boulevard and across to 151S Street (not supported by Anoka County and <br />estimated at $510,000); and, wrapping Krypton Street internal to the site (preferred by Anoka <br />County and estimated at $310,000). <br />Asst. City Administrator /Economic Development Manager Brama presented net proceeds, noting <br />they are highly variable. He explained the option to use Anoka County HRA dollars to resolve <br />access to the site. Net proceeds will range from $101,887 to $301,887 depending on whether <br />Anoka County HRA dollars are used and the access alternative selected. $130,0 total property <br />taxes would be generated by 47 units, or about $35,000 annually to the City of Ramsey in new <br />taxes. He reported that the Parks Commission will be considering this project. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama presented the two alternatives <br />before the Council and staff's recommendation to approve the Purchase Agreement as the terms <br />are favorable. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked about the street alternatives to provide access, who is responsible <br />for the cost to create that access, and the option to use Anoka County HRA funds. <br />Asst. City Administrator /Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the history of access <br />to this site, which has been an outstanding issue. He stated the City's Anoka County HRA <br />account has a balance of over $800,000 available for redevelopment projects and staff finds this <br />would be an appropriate use for those funds. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained why the issue of access was not resolved <br />when the Meadow Plat was considered. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated the issue needs to be resolved to address access by Public <br />Works and emergency vehicles, not just to accommodate this project. <br />Councilmember Riley stated this is really a net offer because the purchase is requiring the <br />buildings to be removed. He asked if the net offer is in an acceptable range. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated if the cost to remove <br />the OMC buildings is deducted from the purchase price, it is within the deal range. <br />Brian Pankratz of CBRE stated that is correct and when this was originally considered, it was not <br />known that access needed to be resolved. <br />Councilmember Riley stated other than providing a clean site, no assistance is being requested. <br />He noted this site has been discussed extensively and all supported a residential neighborhood, <br />which also fits the zoning. He agreed that access is an issue that needs to be addressed <br />eventually. <br />City Council / January 13, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />