Laserfiche WebLink
20. That o~ hmu:,'y 13, 2004, the Subject Property Owners stated that relocation of the fence 2 <br /> feel oFl' thc property line will require the removal of a significant number of mature pine trees <br /> in ()rdc~ i~ i,',,vide a fence line corridor void of any obstructions for the following reasons: a) <br /> accornl,l i v;l~ t( rmio~a nccessary on wire strands to withstand the force of horses leaning against <br /> thc It n,,:c: i)) avoid any contact of the live wire strands with branches, etc., that would short <br /> circuit ibc :,'h,mric system. <br /> <br />21. That (,~ ,!:,_l~t~:n'y 13, 2004, the Subject Property Owners offered to eliminate the electric <br /> fcalut ~: i] o~ t l~,,_'. [ap. cc i f thc City would not require a 2 foot setback from property line. <br /> <br />22. That (,t Jt~,~ ry 29, 20(/4, thc Subject Properly Owners informed Staffthat a 10-12 foot wide <br /> clear pnth is; ,~cedcd to accommodate the machinery necessary to remove the installed fence <br /> posts lio~; tl~c groun, d. '/'his also would require the removal of a significant number of <br /> I'II[lttll'C !)ill(3 {iCCS. <br /> <br />23. 'Fha~ ~1-~(: t ',,)tn~cil finds a l0 to 12 tbot wide clear path is not needed to remove the installed <br /> Cencc pt)~';(:< fl'< ,m thc ground, <br /> <br />Thc moti(,~ liar fi,~c adoption of the 3bregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Kurak, and 4ti:,~ 'otc' being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Elvig <br />Kurak <br />Cook <br />Pearson <br />Strommen <br />Z immerman <br /> <br />and the Ib/l(,,vi,~!, v'oled against the same: <br /> <br />and thc lb ilr,wi~L,,. :ti)stained: <br /> <br />and thc Ib il()x~/i~j~ ,v(~l'e absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #04-02-044 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />