Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Olds, seconded by Commissioner Lehman, to approve the following <br />Park and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting Minutes: <br /> <br />1) Park and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting Minutes dated December 4, 2003 <br />2) Park and Recreation Commission Work Session Meeting Minutes dated December 4, 2003 <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Johns, Commissioners Olds, Lehman, LaMere, <br />Ostrum, Pontius and Shryock. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Master Trail Plan <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood explained that for the past several months, the Commission <br />has been receiving draft sections of the Master Trail Plan, and directing feedback to LHB, the <br />consulting firm assembling the document. The process is generally on schedule. Parks/Utilities <br />Supervisor Riverblood stated the review tonight will be on the chapter addressing the 'Regional <br />Context of Trails' and to consider the sectionalized trail map of the City depicting the existing <br />and proposed trails. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated she did not have time to look over the chapter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum stated LHB did a good job. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds suggested they should make the maps more legible and place them in a <br />landscape format. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated the maps and images are blurry and the pages are out of order. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated he found some typos and there are number of <br />clarifications needed. He will compare his to Commissioner Shryock's comments. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated LHB would accept changes for the next few weeks. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated the Commission should look at each section and <br />review them for readability. They should also look for space to insert photos. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Commission was to email chapter comments to Mr. Chmielewski. <br /> <br />No action necessary. <br /> <br />Case #2: Consider Increase of Park and Trail Dedication Fees <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton advised that the City Council reviewed all fees at their December 9, <br />2003 meeting and asked why commercial park dedication fees are lower than residential fees and <br />if they should be raised. Civil Engineer II Linton stated staff has gathered information on park <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/January 8, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />