Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member Bentz stated that he would prioritize the available land for business use. He <br /> stated that perhaps industrial manufacturers would not be as concerned with the risk because they <br /> also generate waste. <br /> Board Member Hiatt stated that perhaps the oak savanna could be preserved on that portion of <br /> the site with a business park developed on the other portion of the site. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau confirmed that could be done. He stated that the current <br /> business park being developed is 93 acres. He stated that the challenge currently is that the <br /> desire is for some of the larger scale tracts of business park development. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that the responsibility of the Board is to review applications <br /> relating to natural resources. He stated that this is a unique ecotype that could accommodate <br /> preservation of the oak savanna while still allowing for future development on the larger site. He <br /> acknowledged the well thought out statements from the Board regarding potential contamination <br /> concerns from prospective business owners. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he would agree with the desire to preserve the oak <br /> savanna, noting that in terms of development the site would be low priority. <br /> Motion by Board Member Valentine and seconded by Board Member Hiatt to recommend to the <br /> MPCA that the City will commit to preserving the oak savanna in return for the City being <br /> allowed to pursue commercial development on the eastern portion of the site, contingent upon <br /> the City providing municipal services to avoid the use of ground water. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Stodola, Board Member Valentine, Hiatt, Bentz and <br /> Bernard. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Lewis and Prendergast. <br /> City Planner Anderson confirmed that the oak savanna is high quality but has not been <br /> maintained and described some of the maintenance activities being discussed for the area. <br /> 5.03: Consider Potential Recycling Activities /Opportunities <br /> City Planner Anderson presented the staff report and reviewed the potential recycling events <br /> currently being considered that would qualify for Select Committee on Recycling and the <br /> Environment (SCORE) funding. He asked for feedback from the Board, including any <br /> additional recycling ideas. He stated that the funding request must be submit to the County by <br /> the end of February, noting that the Board could continue to think about ideas and provide that <br /> input at the February Board meeting. <br /> Chairperson Stodola stated that he would be in favor of a zero waste Happy Days event, as that <br /> would not only be a recycling event but also an educational opportunity. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that the public works staff has received many positive comments <br /> acknowledging the opportunity to recycle at Happy Days the past few years. <br /> Board Member Hiatt stated that he would support the promotion of apartment complex recycling <br /> event as apartment complexes have the lowest rate of recycling currently. He stated would <br /> Environmental Policy Board / January 5, 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />