Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the Planning Commission did review a <br /> similar amendment as part of a larger, single ordinance in 2012 that was ultimately not adopted. <br /> This amendment was a smaller portion of the previous ordinance that showed support for moving <br /> forward. The original amendment was coming forward as the City's Strategic Plan was coming <br /> forward, so it was a logical spot to pause and let that process unfold first. The current amendment <br /> fits in well with the City's Strategic Goal to streamline many of our processes. The Planning <br /> Commission recommended that this administrative process be expanded to Minor Plat to <br /> streamline that process as well. He discussed the request further and suggested the Planning <br /> Commission recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance #15 -02. <br /> Citizen Input <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked for clarification on the zoning administrator and the definition of <br /> minor versus major plats. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill discussed the differences between a minor and major <br /> plats. <br /> Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to close the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, Bauer, <br /> Brauer, and Maul. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> Chairperson Levine closed the public hearing closed at 9:57 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Bauer, to recommend that the <br /> City Council adopt Ordinance #15 -02. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Bauer, Brauer, <br /> Maul, and Nosan. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> 5.10: Discuss Sign Standards for Highway 10 Corridor <br /> Presentation <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br /> case is to provide broad policy direction on potential amendments to the City's sign regulations <br /> based on business community feedback and previous sign approvals. This is an introductory <br /> discussion topic at this point. No suggested amendments to City Code have been prepared at this <br /> time. Staff asked for policy direction and focused on sign height. <br /> Planning Commission /January 8, 2015 <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br />