Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the Planning Commission did review a <br />similar amendment as part of a larger, single ordinance in 2012 that was ultimately not adopted. <br />This amendment was a smaller portion of the previous ordinance that showed support for moving <br />forward. The original amendment was coming forward as the City's Strategic Plan was coming <br />forward, so it was a logical spot to pause and let that process unfold first. The current amendment <br />fits in well with the City's Strategic Goal to streamline many of our processes. The Planning <br />Commission recommended that this administrative process be expanded to Minor Plat to <br />streamline that process as well. He discussed the request further and suggested the Planning <br />Commission recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance #15-02. <br />Citizen Input <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked for clarification on the zoning administrator and the definition of <br />minor versus major plats. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill discussed the differences between a minor and major <br />plats. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, Bauer, <br />Brauer, and Maul. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Chairperson Levine closed the public hearing closed at 9:57 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Bauer, to recommend that the <br />City Council adopt Ordinance #15-02. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Bauer, Brauer, <br />Maul, and Nosan. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />5.10: Discuss Sign Standards for Highway 10 Corridor <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to provide broad policy direction on potential amendments to the City's sign regulations <br />based on business community feedback and previous sign approvals. This is an introductory <br />discussion topic at this point. No suggested amendments to City Code have been prepared at this <br />time. Staff asked for policy direction and focused on sign height. <br />Planning Commission/January 8, 2015 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />