My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:35 AM
Creation date
3/9/2015 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/05/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 10, 2015 1 Volume 9 1 Issue 3 Zoning Bulletin <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />CONNECTICUT <br />Norwalk's Common Council's Ordinance Committee is "working to <br />put some teeth into the enforcement of Norwalk's zoning regulations." A <br />proposed Zoning Citation Ordinance aims to "establish a local means of <br />addressing violation rather than relying solely upon State Superior Court." <br />Currently, Norwalk's Department of Planning and Zoning has the ability <br />to pursue compliance through the courts and seek fines as prescribed under <br />state statutes. Under the proposal, Norwalk "would be able to issue cita- <br />tions, meaning daily fines for zoning violations versus a zoning enforce- <br />ment action in court." Citations would impose an initial fine of $150 and <br />an additional fine of $150 per day after five days had passed. The recipient <br />of the violation would have 10 days to make an "uncontested payment" of <br />the fine, or to request a hearing. <br />Source: The Hour; www.thehour.com <br />MASSACHUSETTS <br />A Massachusetts superior court has heard arguments in a chicken zon- <br />ing case. The case addresses the issues of: whether any accessory use not <br />listed in a bylaw must be prohibited; and whether chickens meet the town <br />bylaw's three -pronged test for allowable accessory uses (i.e., must be sub- <br />ordinate to the primary use, reasonably -related to the primary use, and <br />customary within the zone). S <br />Source: The Republican; www.masslive.coin <br />PENNSYLVANIA <br />Four Pulaski residents are challenging the constitutionality of the town- <br />ship zoning ordinance. The residents claim that the township's zoning <br />ordinance "fails to protect residential property owners from having to live <br />near heavy industry." More specifically, they object to the township's <br />2002 zoning ordinance that allows hydraulic fracturing as a "conditional <br />use" in a residential area. The residents argue that the ordinance violates <br />the Pennsylvania constitution "because the zoning ordinance deprives <br />residents `of their constitutionally guaranteed right to enjoyment of private <br />property without due process of law.' " They maintain that oil and gas <br />drilling via hydraulic fracturing is not compatible or safe in a residential <br />zone. <br />Source: New Castle News; www.ncnewsonline.com <br />12 © 2015 Thomson Reuters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.