My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:35 AM
Creation date
3/9/2015 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/05/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. That the Site Plan submitted as part of the Building Permit application indicated the <br />swimming pool would be located at least forty (40) feet from the side lot line of the Subject <br />Property. <br />9. That the adjacent property, 14235 Bowers Dr. NW was recently sold and as part of the title <br />work for that transaction, it was discovered that the swimming pool encroached onto the <br />adjacent property by almost ten (10) feet. <br />10. That to resolve this encroachment, the title company representing the owners of the <br />swimming pool are proposing an Administrative Subdivision to realign the common <br />boundary between the Subject Property and 14235 Bowers Dr. NW to eliminate the <br />encroachment. <br />11. That to minimize the enlargement of the non -conforming lot size, the proposed realigned lot <br />line is just beyond the existing fence that encloses the swimming pool, resulting in a setback <br />of approximately six (6) feet from the side lot line. <br />12. That Travis and Bridgette Richard are the fee title owners of the Subject Property. <br />13. That the encroachment of the swimming pool was not the result of actions of either the <br />current or most recent former fee title owner of the Subject Property. <br />14. That economic circumstances alone do not create the practical difficulties. <br />15. That the plight is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. <br />16. That the plight was not created by the Applicant. <br />17. That, if granted, the variance will not alter the locality's essential character. <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property. <br />19. That, if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited <br />in the applicable zoning district. <br />20. That, if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the public <br />street. <br />21. That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety <br />and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br />22. That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br />RESOLUTION #15-03-065 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.