My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 02/05/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2015
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 02/05/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:57:56 PM
Creation date
3/9/2015 9:00:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
02/05/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A. Recommendations <br />We understand that the City has a goal of planning for a cost effective and market - relevant business park. <br />The proposed scope of work as requested in the RFQ and discussed herein will help the City realize that <br />goal. At this time, we can only offer minor recommendation as discussed below. <br />Regional Stormwater Facilities <br />There are many benefits of managing stormwater regionally as opposed to a site by site basis. One <br />significant benefit is that regional facilities utilize less land than site specific facilities, making more land <br />available for development. Another benefit is the reduced construction costs of constructing a couple of <br />larger regional facilities as opposed to several smaller facilities. Regional facilities are also attractive to <br />the end user as the stormwater requirements have already been planned for, eliminating an unknown. <br />Multi -Modal Connectivity to the Northstar Station, the COR, and surrounding areas <br />The City may want to consider an expanded scope of services for determining the appropriate pedestrian <br />facilities to encourage multi -modal transportation to the Northstar Station, the COR, and the adjacent <br />regional trails. For example, is an at grade crossing at Armstrong Boulevard sufficient or should the <br />feasibility of a pedestrian overpass or underpass be evaluated along the corridor? <br />Alignment of Development Standards to Complement the COR <br />Given the close proximity of the subject property with the COR, the City may wish to consider enhanced <br />development standards for the subject property. For example, should some of the streetscaping elements <br />be carried over into the subject property? Should some of the signage standards be carried over to the <br />subject property? <br />I in ia Improvements . <br />• s <br />1 <br />4) 1 <br />1= 1 <br />11 1 <br />1 1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 1 <br />k. <br />IXIMNG LANDUSES <br />FUTURE LANDUSES. Zoning <br />.r f� <br />EL(�15ki4' <br />Recommendations, Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.