My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/12/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/12/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:56:26 PM
Creation date
3/9/2015 9:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As the Commission will recall, a similar invitation for ideas and public comment was issued for <br />the lake feature in The COR, and the Commission held an open house explicitly for this purpose. <br />Much planning and visioning for the park space called Lake Ramsey on the City's development <br />plan remains. <br />There is a strong beneficial value to commercial and residential properties that abut quality parks. <br />For this reason, expressing what either of these two proposed parks ("Lake Ramsey" and <br />Municipal Plaza) may look like is useful in attracting developers. Additionally there can be <br />cross -easements and shared uses for certain amenities and infrastructure, e.g. a park may <br />accommodate stormwater from an adjacent residential property, or a restaurant site may have <br />public/private paths that lead customers to the business, or an adjoining park may provide seating <br />or programming beneficial to a particular business. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood continued another reason that <br />exploring concepts for the two proposed park together is timely, in that given their close <br />geographic relationship (and eventual connection in some manner), the public spaces should be <br />complimentary in opportunities for residents and visitors, and should have minimum <br />redundancies in what they offer patrons in terms of programming and experience. <br />Riverblood provided three alternatives for the proposed Municipal Plaza. Staff is seeking any and <br />all feedback from the Commission, residents and the business community. This invitation shall <br />be extended via the city's website, and each commission, board and City Council will be asked to <br />engage as well. In the end, the park space may look and function like one of the concepts <br />presented, a hybrid of the three — or something quite different. There is no timeline per se, <br />however a buyer may be found for the land adjacent to the park(s) and a park development plan <br />may be crafted that is synergistic with the new residential or commercial land use. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated Staff will continue to <br />assimilate all comments on parks and public spaces within The COR — and it is Staff' s <br />recommendation for Commissioners to have discussions with residents, friends and neighbors on <br />these planning endeavors, and share the feedback with Staff, within or aside from the regular <br />Commission meeting. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood showed the location of the <br />Municipal Park. He provided a drawing of the Current Master Plan of the area. <br />Concept 1 — To include a water feature with a large open field. This would provide an <br />opportunity to have a tree lighting with the planting of a tree. This concept would be 1.8 acres. <br />Concept 2 — This would be a different, more rectangular shape and more linear. There would be a <br />green connection with the lake feature. A water feature may be at the entrance of the park. This <br />would include a promenade, forest walk and a prominent entryway. <br />Concept 3 — This concept would include a woonerf & commercial edge, fountain, iconic tree and <br />open field and entryway. There would also be a shared street that could be closed to motorized <br />traffic at certain times. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/January 8, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.