My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/20/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 12/20/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:04:50 PM
Creation date
3/22/2004 9:28:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/20/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0f <br /> <br />The Honorable Thomas G. Gamec ~:~ '~)V~ ~] <br />Mayor ' <br />City of Ramsey ~,_ <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard, N W <br />RamseS, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Ma~or Gamec: <br /> <br />Because of your ~nterest in legislation affectin~ tax-exempt bonds, I wanted to <br /> the status of such at the end of the First <br />brin~ <br /> up-to-date <br /> ~ou <br /> OB <br /> legislation <br />Session of the Ogth Con,ress. <br /> <br />As part of the not as yet enacted Tax Reform hct of 1~83, the House Ways and <br />Means Committee approved legislation which is ~enerall~ designed to restrict the <br />total volume of tax-exempt bonds that could be issued in any ~iven state, without <br />further restrictin~ the use of the proceeds of such bonds. Generally, states would <br />be allowed to issue bonds up to a ceilin~ determined b~ multipl~in~ the number of <br />people in the state b~ $150. This $150 "per capita cap" would be divided between <br />state and local units of'government. States whose current bond activity exceeds <br />$150 per capita would be given two years to reduce their private purpose bond <br />issuances to the cap levels. The cap would be further reduced in 1986 to $100 <br />per capita, to reflect the elimination of small issue IDB's. Single family mortgage <br /> bonds (which currently have their own cap), and multi-family housing <br />revenue <br />]DB's (under a Ways and ~eans Cool,tee approved amendment), would be exempt <br />from ~he restric~ons in %he <br /> <br />Other provisions have also been ~nc]uded ~n ~he Ways and ~eans Co~ittee <br />hmiUn9 %he arbRraGe which may be earned on a bond issue, and ]imiUng the <br />pracUce of selling portions of a project as a means of avoiding ~he $10 m~Hion <br />small ~ssue hmitat~on. <br /> <br />A volume cap on private purpose ~ax-exemp~ bonds was not my first'choice as a <br />means of res[ric~qG[hei~_~se. The Ways and ~eans Co~i[%ee, however, lek <br />wa~ve~mp~Ian~-'i~-%]ow %he future Growth of ~he use of ~e bonds due <br />explosion of Growth which has occurred in ~he use of ~ax-exemp% bonds in recent <br /> Now nearly everybody uses %hem for nearly every~ing. Tax-exempt bonds <br />years. <br />Gene~]}y'~shou~d be ~he fin3ndng vehicle of ]as~ resort. ]n ~ime of short supply <br />cred~[;-.~r.~hiGh in[er~s~"~a~es, however, they are often the only Game in town. <br /> <br />The'~b~]] at%~m])%s~%o re~nforce this point, and a~%emp%s [o discourage ~he percepUon <br />~ha[ .~axLexem~-is are-designed [o be a f~rs~ choice as a means of f~nanc~nG <br />purpose pro]e(ts.-~n ~ehoos~ng a cap rather than ~mposinG further extremelY.~ severe <br />res~c~ons..~n~ %he depreciation of %ax-exemp~ proper~y, the Co~ittee a%%e~p~ed <br />de%~]op-~n eq~itab~e and un~form system for hm]t~nG ~he rap~d Growth of [a~-exempt <br />bcnds~-~[[hou% specif~aJ]y..te]hng states for which pro~ec[s they could or (ould not <br />iss}~ bonds. '.'" ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.