Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Porupsky stated that trained dogs are valued at $5500 and the Minneapolis <br />Police Department cannot afford to let them run out of control or lose %hem. <br /> <br />Motion kS, Co~unissioner Hendricksen and seconed by Commissioner Deemer to recommen~ <br />approval of the conditional use permit for a private kennel for Mr. Jeffrey <br />Porupsky, contingent upon his entering into a conditional use permit agreement <br />with the City. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Kannen, Deemer, <br />Zimmerman, Hendricksen and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: C~issioner <br />Schneider. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson informed Mr. Porupsky that his request for conditional use <br />permit will be on Council's agenda for December 22, 1983. <br /> <br />Case %2: Flintwood Hills P.U.D.: <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson stated that on Saturday, December 3, 1983, representatives <br />of NDH, Flintwood I, P & Z and City Staff met to resolve some of the problem <br />areas of Flintwood II proposed P.U.D. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Carson stated that the residents of Flintwood I requested that the density <br />proposed in Flintwood II Phase I be reduced, a natural screening be provided <br />between Flintwood I and Flintwood II, and that all buildings be under a homeowners <br />association. As a result, NDH has the following to offer: proposing 8 quads <br />instead of 5 8-unit buildins in Phase I, units being bu/lt at entrance of project <br />will be of the more expensive type. <br /> <br />Mx. Ralph Hendrikson - 5460 140th Lane - Stated that the buildings should be <br />more spread out than what is proposed. ~uld prefer 6.quads instead of 8. <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mx. Carson stated that it could be done if the tot lot was .deleted from the plans. <br /> <br />Mr. Stan Data - 5510 140th Lane - Agreed with Mr. Hendrikson's suggestion for <br />more open space and would also like to see more landscaping. Flintwood I and <br />II should match as much as possible. The transition f~om Flintwood I to <br />Flintwood II should be grad-a], the density lost in Phase I could be regained <br />in Phase II. Mr. Date stated that Mr. Les Batman was unable to attend tonight's <br />meeting and is requesting that P & Z consider not having a cul-de-sac feed <br />into an MSA street and that he also prefers that Flintwood II he'developed <br />as single dwellings. Mr. Data stated that Mr. John Lichter is also unable to <br />attend tonight's meeting and requests that it be made known that he would <br />personally be satisfied with developing quad-type units. Mr. Data stated that <br />Susan Beale is unable to attend tonight's meeting and her view is that this <br />PUD would bring sewer and water into the City and she doesn't understand why <br />it has to be. Mr. Data stated as his own view that he wonders if this <br />~evelo~entwill be able to pay it's own way. Will ~ find ourselves in the <br />same situation that Shor~wood currently is in? <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that he has researched the Shorewood situation and <br />Shorewood's original intent was to have a lot more density in the sewered area <br />and for some reason their zoning and develol~ment did not occur. P~m~ey's <br />intent is to not overbuild the sytem. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that a trunk will not be constructed beyond the proposed <br />PUD; wells will be sized to serve just that area a~nd maybe tae area acr.Dss <br />the street and it is intende~ that it %-ill more than pay it's o~ way. It <br />ali ~.: .... ~7. d~velopment ~ th~ developer i~ g£ing to h~'~ to go for <br /> <br />Z/Decem!er 6, 1983 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />