Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> MINNESOTA <br />WASTE ~ANAGEP~HT BOARD <br /> <br />Locatton <br /> <br /> GROUP QUESTIOHHAIRE..ON POLICIES AHD PROSRAHS *. <br /> <br /> GROUP B <br />Nost people agree on the need to properly deal ~tth hazardous wastes, to prot~ct~ <br />the enviromnt'and publtc safety. It's how ~t deal wtth the hazardous waste problem <br />-- who should pa.v the costs, ~ho should be-~ responsibility, and what 'types of hazardous <br />waste management p~ogrems are needed, tn gtnnesota -- that's st111 unresolved, and <br />on whtCh people may disagree. <br /> <br />As a group, dtscuss the followfng questions, and try to reach a consensus on each <br />tssue. Each group wtll then report back to the other participants and share 1ts <br />conclusions. ~ <br /> <br />l.. NASTE REDUCTI~ -.. <br /> <br /> The #asea ganagement Board considers hazardous ~aste reduction ti be the most . <br /> preferable ~thod of waste management: tt resoIves hazardous ~aste problems by' <br /> .t!tmfnattng all or part of the waste Itself. flo~ever, the Board also recognizes <br /> that there ts a technical ltntt to how much waste reduction can be achieved, <br /> and that some'Industrial processes ~111 always tnvolve generetton of ~unts <br /> of hazardous wastes. Some ~tnnesota generators have already reduced their.hazard- <br /> ous waste generation significantly. '. <br /> <br /> 'la."Should the state place a htgher priority on hazardous waste reductlon than <br /> ~ on other methods of waste management, such as ~aste trea~ent or proper <br /> disposal, by concentrating tis activities more on encouraging hazardous. <br /> · -waste reduction than tn developing hazardous ~ste facilities? <br /> <br /> .Yes No Undecided <br /> <br />.lb... ~hich of the following shobld the state do'to encourage ~aste reduction? <br /> (~re than one may be checked) <br /> <br /> Offer technical asststence to generators <br /> Offer postttve Incentives to generators~ such as tax credits f~r Investing <br /> 'In equlpmeqt needed to-achieve ~ste reduction.. <br /> <br /> Offer disincentives for generators, such as new taxes on,wastes;generated <br /> <br /> .Require spectftc levels of waste reduction by generators tn state regulations <br /> <br /> Rcttvely discourage tndustr~es ~tch generate hazardous wastes <br /> locattng In'#tnnesote <br /> <br /> ~ther (specify). <br /> <br /> Undecided <br /> <br />Comments: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SHALL GENERATORS <br /> <br />Businesses ~htch.'gen~rate seal1 volumes of hazardbus waste may face spectal problems <br />tn managing thetr wastes that larger generators do not, These:problems tnclude <br />greater transportation' and administrative costs and a relative'lack:of resources <br />and personnel to devote to'waste management. Soae examples of small hazardous- <br />Waste generators are auto .body' shops, seal1 machine shop~ and. printers. <br /> <br />2a. Should the~state trea~ small generators (for example, generators producSng <br /> less than 3 tons of hazbrdous waste per year) differently'than generators <br /> of larger amounts of hazardous waste? <br /> <br /> Yes No Undecided <br /> <br />(over) <br /> <br /> <br />