My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/15/1983 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 08/15/1983 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:00:17 PM
Creation date
3/22/2004 11:04:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
08/15/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by and seconded by to adopt <br />Resolution #83- requesting that the Minnesota Department <br />of Transportation approve the plans for the ingress and egress <br />from State Highway #47 to the City of Ramsey's recreation area. <br />(Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #83- .) <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no <br /> <br />GRANTING OF VARIANCE IN I~EGAI~DS <br /> <br />TO PARAGRAPH 170. 0310C ENTITLED <br /> <br />"RECORDING"OF THE CITY CODE: <br /> <br />During this recession, the City of Ramsey started granting variances <br />to Paragraph 170.0310C of the City Code which pertains to the recording <br />of a plat which accomplished the following for the developer: <br /> <br />a) He did not get committed to a development contract to put <br /> in a street for his development. <br /> <br />b) He did not get committed to an increase in property taxes <br /> on his land because his land is in an unplatted state. <br /> <br />The question is, does the Council want to continue on with granting <br />these variances, as they do become an administrative problem for <br />the City of Ramsey. We currently have the following developments <br />that fall into this category: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />Meadowbrook Estates - They were granted final plat approval <br />back in September 1980 and they still haven't entered into <br />a development agreement or recorded the plat. <br /> <br />Reason - The developer does not want to invest his money <br />in street costs or get stuck with a tax increase.when property <br />is not in demand. <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Hy-10 Ramsey - They were granted final plat approval back <br />in March 1981 and sinbe that time have been granted a variance <br />from the City Code. They have constructed the streets in <br />this project but haven't filed the plat. <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Ramsey Commons - The~ were granted final plat approval on <br />August 24, 1982 and since that time has been granted one <br />variance. The problem here has been in securing clear title <br />to the land. <br /> <br />I will go over this in more detail with Council at the meeting. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to note that this has been before <br />you. However, all of the above plats will need time extensions which <br />we will discuss at the meeting.' <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.