Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/17/1983

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Van Wagner to table Approval of Bid Specifications and to schedule a special Council Meeting for November 7, 1983 at 7:00 p.mo to review the proposed computer system. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, Schlueter and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. Refer to Page 12, Paragraph 10 of these minutes for further action. Case #2: Amending Of City Code Regarding Park Fees In The Subdiv£din~ Of Property: Mr. Berg noted a correction to the proposed ordinance; Section 170.062 and 170.063 - Change references to 'permit fee' to 'valuation'. Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Van Wagner to adopt Ordinance #83-13 which is an ordinance amending Chapter 170.03 entitled "Subdivision", Section 170.038F, "Dedication of Parks and Open Spaces", Subparagraph 2 of the City Code, with the following correction: Section 170.062 and Section 170.063 - Change references to 'permit fee' to 'valuation'. (Please refer to ordinance file for Ordinance #83-13). Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, Schlueter and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. Case #3: Upgradi~ Of Magnesium Street NW: City Attorney Goodrich stated that he has met with Mr. Hoffman, Mr. & Mrs. Gillman and Mrs. Boeris. Mr. Hoffman and Mr. & Mrs. Gillman are present tonight but Mrs. Boeris could not attend. Ramsey's concern is not the extension of Magnesium but the portion that presently exists. That street has never been accepted by the City. In the past, individuals obtained building permits without the street being a public street and now there are residents living on that street. The original developer was Norm Holm and he did blacktop up to the Hoffman property. The City Engineer feels that the street should have an overlay in order to meet City standards. Have attained easements from Hoffman and Boeris and Holm is also willing. There is some opposition on the part of the Gillmans. The right-of-way we are proposing is % on the Hoffman property and % on the Gillman property. The Gillmans object because the travelled portion is 100% on their side of the property and that would leave a 3-4 foot boulevard between the travelled portion and the Gillman property. Mrs. Gillman stated that the street should be realigned so that it divides the two properties, that they desire the norm of paying taxes to the middle of the street. City Attorney Goodrich stated that the City Engineer has recommended that the City accept the street as it is now positioned and at the time of public improvements the City will center the road. Mr. Goodrich further commented that Mrs. Boeris is very concerned about the plowing of this road in the winter, that she lives alon~ and must be~able to get to work in the winter. C/¢ctober 25, 1983 Page 11 of 24