Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Goodrich state~ that he has spoken with County Commissioner <br />Natalie Haas and she has indicated that she will support whatever position <br />the City of Ramsey takes. , <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Resolution #83-17 that the City of Ramsey go on record as opposing <br />Site "P" and further to request that the County remove Site "P" from it's <br />inventory of sites. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: 'Council consensus is that the Resolution #83-17 was <br />adopted based on Ramsey's Landfill Impact Repo~ and.economic reasons <br />outlined in that report, further that Mr. Cox's'letter of March 21, 1983 <br />regarding Site "P" will serve as' the basis for the resolution. <br /> <br />Natalie Haas - Was present at the meeting and commented that the County does <br />not have the authority to delete Site "P", only to recommend that Metro <br />Council delete Site "P". <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich suggested that someone representing the City of Ramsey <br />attend the County meeting scheduled for March 22, 1983. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recommended that City Attorney Goodrich and City Administrator <br />Schnelle attend the County meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann amends his motion to include that City Attorney Goodrich <br />and City Administrator Schnelle attend the County meeting on March 22, 1983. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteber§ seconded the amendment to the moti~on. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Schlueter, Reimann, <br />Van Wagner and Sorteberg. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: Work Session Re~ardin§ Proposed Public Improvements and Special <br /> Assessments Policy: <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter distributed copies of a list of questions she has <br />outlined regarding the Public Utilities Ordinace. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich informed the audience that the proposed policy is a <br />33 page document (pages 1-15 deal withLPolicy and pages 16-33 are amendments <br />to the ordinance) prepared by the Ad Hbc Committee. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />John Lichter commented that the Ad Hoc Committee did not make a resolution <br />to adopt this policy, that the Ad Hoc Committee compiled and prepared the <br />policy and only forwarded it to the Council for their revieW and adoption. <br /> <br />Question #1: Explain "The amount of the charge does not exceed the value <br /> of the benefits received." <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the State law dictates that you cannot <br />assess anyone for anything if they do not benefit by it and the citizenry <br />have the right to appeal an assessment. <br /> <br />Question #2- Word "specially" found in BENEFIT PRINCIPAL, can we use the <br /> work "specifically" interchangeably? <br /> <br />Sp C/March 21, 1983 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />