Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I- I I I I Commissioner Zimmerman asked if this construction was for a new building. Comissioner Deemer stated that the variance was for a temporary building. Chairman Peterson stated that he had no problem with the findings. He asked if anyone else had a problem with them. There was no response. Mr. Berg stated that a conditional use permit was not required for the business but for the structure and felt this was the best way to handle it. He will have to enter into an agreement for the building. Motion by Comissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner SChneider to recomend adopting the proposed findings of fact for Mr. and Mrs. James Chapman's conditional use permit request. m Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Zimmerman, Deemer, Schneider and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Kennen. m m Chairman Peterson asked Mr. and Mrs. Chapman if they had reviewed the agreement and if they were in agreement with it. They indicated they were. Commissioner Deemer asked about the required setback for the building. I I I Mr. Berg indicated they were in compliance with the setbacks. Commissioner Schneider a~ked of City utilities become available, Would the buildings have to be removed within a certain period of time. Mr. Berg indicated there is a time limit for their removal. Motion by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to recommend that the City approve Mr. and Mrs. James Chapman's request for a conditional use permit to construct the necessary buildings and operate a garden market at 6745 West Highway ~10 contingent upon their entering into an agreement wit~' the City. ~ m m m m m- m Further Discussion: Mr. Chapman asked Mr. Berg what would make this a permanent building. Mr. Berg stated it would have to meet the State Building Code requirements. Mr. Chapman and Mr. Berg discussed briefly the code requirements - permanent vs. temporary. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Zimelnre41~ Deemer, .LaDue and Schneider. Voting No: None. Absent: ~comissioner-Kennen.____ _.)'~$ Case #2: Requ'est For Concept Approval For-Pondvale Estates Second Additi~: Mr. and Mrs. Mary Kytonen were present, k~ Discussion ensued regarding access and drainage. Commissioner Deemer referred to Item #6 of the City Engineer's report and stated that it should be deleted and that the City Engineer should note that al~,park fees were paid at the time of the original plat. P & Z/October 4, 1983 Paoe 3 of B