My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:03:42 PM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:03:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I~ROPOSED <br />FINDI~S OF FACT <br />FOR MICHA~. MANDEI{ <br /> <br />1) That the Applicant properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance <br />to construct a detached accessory building in front of the front setback <br />of his principal structure. <br /> <br />2) That the setback of the proposed accessory building from the front property <br />line will comply with City Code. <br /> <br />3) That the applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public <br />hearing pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance on October 25, 1983. That <br />said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public <br />hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />4) That the applicant's request is to construct an accessory building in <br />front of the front setback of his principal structure. <br /> <br />5) That the property is generally known as 16832 Nutria Street NW and is <br />legally described as Lot 1, Block 4, Autumn Heights. <br /> <br />6) That such a variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment <br />of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties <br />in the same district and in the same vicinity. <br /> <br />7) That the authorization of such a variance will not be of subtantial <br />detriment to the adjacent properties and will not materially impair the intent <br />and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />8) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property is <br />not so general or reoccurant in nature as to make reasonably practical the <br />formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. <br /> <br />9) That the variance observes the spirit and intent of the ordinance and <br />is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br />10) That properly constructed, the structure will comply with the requirements <br />of the State Building Code. <br /> <br />11) That the applicant has agreed to enter into a Development Agreement <br />in consideration of said variance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.