Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> PROPOSED <br />PIKDII~GS OF FACT <br />FOR 67~RAI.D #IT.T.~ <br /> <br />1) That the applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment hearing <br />to construct an accessory building larger than allowed by City Ordinance. <br /> <br />2) That the applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public <br />hearing on October 25, 1983 and that said public hearing was properly <br />advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated <br />as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />3) That the applicant's property is approximately one acre in size and is <br />generally known as 9015 - 176th Avenue NW. <br /> <br />4) That the applicant's request is to build an accessory building with <br />dimensions of 26' x 30' or 780 square feet. <br /> <br />5) That the applicant's existing attached garage is 576 square feet. <br /> <br />6) That City Ordinance restricts accessory buildings on parcels of land <br />of less than 2.5 acres to a maximum of 624 square feet. <br /> <br />7) That the City Ordinance, on a parcel of property of this size, would <br />allow for an attached garage of 864 square feet and a detached accessory <br />building of 624 square feet for a combined total of 1,488 square feet. <br /> <br />8) That granting the applicant's request would give him a total of 1,356 <br />square feet of accessory buildings. <br /> <br />9) That there are not exceptional, unique or extraordinary circumstances <br />or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use <br />of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br />zoning district. <br /> <br />10) That such variance is necessary not for the preservation and enjoyment <br />of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties <br />in the same district and in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased <br />financial return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a <br />variance. <br /> <br />11) That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment <br />to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent and purpose <br />of this Ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />12) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property, or <br />the intended use of said property, for which the variance is sought, is not <br />of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the <br />formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation. <br /> <br />13) That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, <br />produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br />14) That properly constructed, the building would comply with the requirements <br />of the State Building Code. <br /> <br />15) That the applicant has agreed to enter into an agreement with the City <br />of Ramsey guaranteeing conditions of his development. <br /> <br /> <br />