My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:03:42 PM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:03:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development programs of regional agencies, the Council will look at the. <br />following when implementing this policy: <br /> <br />Economic Impact Review. How many long=term jobs will be created by this <br />proposal? Will they be high=income, high=skill jobs, low-income, low-skill <br />jobs, or some of both? Will the project add to regional income? Will the <br />project add to the regional property tax base? Other tax bases? Will it <br />generate a net increase in tax revenues? Is the project creating new jobs <br />besides construction jobs? <br /> <br />Fiscal Alternatives Assessment° For projects within the MUSA, the Council <br />will evaluate the costs of building now, anticipating the demand based on <br />the proposed project, or building later when the demand actually occurs~ <br />If the costs are not significantly different, and they might not be because <br />the construction may be occurring on developed land in either case, then <br />the Council will have more flexibility in its planning process~ The <br />Council would be able to wait and see on some developments where the <br />proposed growth seems too optimistic° <br /> <br />Public/Private Cost Sharing Agreements. There may be occasions where the <br />private sector wants additional capacity in the regional systems within the <br />MUSA to make a proposal feasible~ There may also be occasions when private <br />interests argue that there will be no impacts on the regional systems and <br />the Council feels differently. Rather than being in a position where the <br />Council could essentially stop the project, the Council and the private <br />party would agree to share the costs now, in the former case, to get the <br />project going; or to share the costs when it becomes a problem, in the <br />latter case. This does not mean that the Council is taking a position of <br />always sharing the cost for private decisions or giving up the right to say <br />no on a regional system proposal~ <br /> <br /> m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.