My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:03:42 PM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:03:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> ! <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY POLICY <br /> <br />What are the characteristics of the poor and the unemployed in the Region, <br />and where'do they live? <br /> <br />The ultimate purpose of all Metropolitan Council policies, including those <br />devised to address problems of the poor, is to maintain or improve the quality <br />of life in the Region. However, the poor cannot afford to partake of many <br />aspects of our "high quality of life." <br /> <br />The Council's direct role in dealing with problems of the poor has been through_ <br />its housing assistance and aging programs. Less directly, it has addressed <br />these concerns in its housing allocation plan, housing affordability studies, <br />and transit studies relating to the needs of the poor, minorities, and the <br />handicapped. If the problems are going to be addressed from the economic side, <br />then the Council needs to look more closely at the characteristics of the poor <br />and unemployed and where they are located. <br /> <br />According to the 1980 census there are nearly 131,000 persons in the Region <br />living below the poverty level, 6.8 percent of the population. Other census <br />data shows two things: First, female-headed families make up a disproportion- <br />ate share of poor families. Second, minorities are also below the poverty <br />level at a far higher rate than whites. <br /> <br />Fifty-five percent of families with incomes below the poverty level are <br />female headed with no husband present, yet they account for only 12.5 percent <br />of families. Almost half of such families with children under six live below <br />poverty. <br /> <br />The figures for racial or ethnic minorities are even worse. Only 5.7 percent <br />of whites lived in households that had incomes below the poverty level (1979 <br />census figures). In sharp contrast, 26.4 percent of blacks, nearly 30 percent <br />of Indians, 23.9 percent of Asians and 17.4 percent of Hispanics were living <br />below the poverty level. These groups also have higher proportions of female- <br />headed households. Age might also be a factor; minorities are, on the aver- <br />age, much younger and, consequently, at an earlier, lower-paid level in their <br />careers. However, they also have fewer elderly, who are also relatively <br />poorer. A higher proportion of elderly have incomes below the poverty level-- <br />10.1 percent compared to 6.6 percent under age 55. The percentages are lower <br />for the 55-to-59 year olds (four percent) and 60-to-64 year olds (5.7 percent). <br /> <br />Based on the persons living below the poverty level, poverty is clearly <br />concentrated in the central cities (Minneapolis and St. Paul). They have 58 <br />percent of the Region's 131,000 people living below the poverty level. All but <br />four of 87 census tracts with more than 15 percent of persons living below the <br />poverty level were in Minneapolis and St. Paul, with most of the very lowest <br />ones in Minneapolis. The exceptions were: Fort Snelling (only 127 people), <br />Falcon Heights (student housing) and two rural communities--New Trier (Dakota <br />County) and Hancock Twp. (Carver County). In Minneapolis all tracts with over <br />25 percent below poverty are located in a ring surrounding the downtown. St. <br />Paul has far fewer census tracts where over 25 percent of the population is <br />below the poverty level. Despite the concentrations in Minneapolis and St. <br />Paul, there are still large numbers of rural and suburban persons living in <br />poverty, about 55,000 (42 percent). <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.