Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative #2. Amend the policy direction to include a City park within the proposed <br /> development. This would require the Applicant to revise the proposed development as presented. <br /> The addition of a park in this area would reduce resources available for other future <br /> improvements already planned and would add to the City's ongoing maintenance costs. (The <br /> Park and Recreation Commission previously held that, there are adequate parks, recreation, and <br /> open spaces available to the proposed development within reasonable distance.) This alternative <br /> would reduce or eliminate the cash contribution to the Park Trust Fund to be utilized to enhance <br /> the existing, surrounding parks and trail connections. <br /> Over the past years the City has looked at various options for the use of the property. It was <br /> decided to have a policy of not constructing pocket parks putting more focus on the community <br /> parks and trail connections to existing parks within the City. <br /> Staff recommends that the City confirm the existing Parks and Trail Master Plan and not include <br /> a new City Park within the proposed development known as Harvest Estates. <br /> Park dedication is suggested cash in lieu of land for Harvest Estates. Maintain the policy of not <br /> constructing pocket parks. Mr. Riverblood indicated the location of the property on a map. There <br /> is a great need for park improvements, as noted in the Park Improvement Plan, which reaffirms <br /> not constructing any pocket parks. The trail systems and sidewalks in the surrounding <br /> neighborhoods are complete. Solstice Park is disconnected from the trail system. The City does <br /> own a small parcel that could be used to connect the two cul -de -sacs to Soltis Park. <br /> Chair Bennett stated he does not feel the Commission has changed their mind on the policy of <br /> not creating pocket parks and in taking cash in lieu of land to support improvements in other <br /> larger parks. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Barr, seconded by Commissioner Fyten, to recommend that the City <br /> Council confirm the existing Parks and Trail Master Plan and not include a new City park within <br /> the proposed development known as Harvest Estates and reaffirm the Commission's Policy. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Bennett, Commissioners Barr, Fyten, Chubb, Mobry <br /> and Trappen. Voting No: None. Absent: <br /> 6. COMMISSION /STAFF INPUT <br /> Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Mark Riverblood reviewed the following: <br /> Winter Recreation — Some of the winter recreation activities are less than normal for the year due <br /> to the lack of snow. The sledding hill at Alpine Park is open. The ski trails are maintained at <br /> Rum River Central. <br /> Mississippi River Trail and Tourism — A bike trip is planned for Itasca to Iowa Border and one of <br /> the stops they are looking at is the Comfort Inn. <br /> Park and Recreation Commission /February 12, 2015 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />