Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed Ordinance Amendment also would eliminate the requirement for a driveway to service any detached <br />accessory building with a doorway opening of eight (8) feet wide by seven (7) feet tall or greater (essentially the <br />equivalent of a single stall garage door). Staff has received quite a bit of feedback, mostly negative, regarding this <br />requirement. The intention was to help reinforce off-street parking standards (vehicles being stored/parked on a <br />prepared surface). However, this can add a substantial cost to a project for an improvement (driveway) that <br />typically would not be accessed or utilized on a regular basis. Furthermore, it has the effect of requiring additional <br />impervious surfacing on a lot, which increases stormwater runoff while simultaneously reducing infiltration on a <br />property. It is worth noting that the driveway requirement remains applicable for attached garages (or additions <br />thereto) because they generally serve as the primary garage for a property and are regularly accessed. <br />Finally, there are a couple of clarifications and/or housekeeping items that are being addressed with this Ordinance <br />Amendment. Currently, attached garages are counted toward the total number of accessory buildings allowed on a <br />property. With this Ordinance Amendment, attached garages would be excluded from the calculation of total <br />number of accessory buildings on a property as appears to have been the intent after reviewing the public hearing <br />minutes from 2011. The other housekeeping item addressed is clarifying that only those detached accessory <br />buildings addressed by MSBC are subject to the architectural standards requirement including soffit, fascia, and <br />eave overhangs to match the home. <br />The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing at their March 5, 2015 meeting and there were no written or <br />verbal comments received regarding the proposed Ordinance Amendment. The Planning Commission requested the <br />Ordinance Amendment be revised slightly to clarify that a driveway would be required if a detached accessory <br />building were to serve as the primary garage. Staff has updated the draft Ordinance Amendment to incorporate this <br />clarification. <br />Funding Source: <br />This ordinance is being prepared as part of normal Staff duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission recommends that City Council adopt Ordinance #15-06. <br />Action: <br />Motion to introduce Ordinance #15-06. <br />Attachments <br />City Code Section 117-349: Redlined Text <br />City Code Section 117-111: Redlined Text <br />Photos of Plastic Sheds Over 120 Square Feet in Size <br />Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Dated March 5, 2015 <br />Ordinance #15-06 <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 03/17/2015 11:36 AM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 03/18/2015 05:29 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 03/09/2015 03:51 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 03/18/2015 <br />