Laserfiche WebLink
Darryl Fults stated that the reason he proposed that language was <br />when he bought his lot, he bought on a contract for deed, as many do. <br />I would not have had a large enough payment for specials and that <br />would have eliminated me from buying that lot on time payments. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that his major concern is that each and every year <br />the City is able to pay principle and interest on bond. If there is <br />not enough money to cover the bond for that year, it will go on the <br />budget as a special levy. Will go along with anything if City Attorney <br />can assure us that we can reach out and grab land and sell it if special <br />assessments are no% paid. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that regardless if the property was sold on a <br />contract for deed, as far as the City is concerned the developer is <br />still responsible for the assessments and letter of credit will not <br />be released until assessments are paid. <br /> <br />Jack Menkveld stated that the State would pay up any pending assessments <br />on particular pieces of property as it is auctioned by the State. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that EDC recommended amendment to 170.039D5 - <br />Item 5 - Alternative Assessment Procedures - Item a: 100% Assessment With <br />a 150% letter of credit and Item b: 100% assessment with 35% cash deposit <br />and a mortgage on property. Mr. Goodrich stated that the point of discussion <br />is whether or not City wants to take a chance on 35% not covering assessment <br />payment and City have to foreclose on lots for the money to pay the assessments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteberg suggested the bank hold first mortgage. <br /> <br />Jack Menkveld stated that the City has first mortgage anyway because of tax <br />laws, there is a guarantee already built into the system. <br /> <br />Robert Johnson - Attorney for Norm Holm - Stated he was born and raised in <br />Ramsey and owns property in the North portion of Ramsey. Have had the <br />opportunity of conducting hearings on annexations throughout the ~0unty <br />He was township attorney when Ramsey drew up ordinances. Stated he is <br />impressed with citizen participation and commended Council for taking time <br />to make people aware of the situation. First, when you are talking about <br />sewer, you have base value of lot and what is added to that is simply cost <br />of sewer. When you take 35% of that cost, and I submit to you that that is <br />much more conservative than other cities I know of. Those that have been <br />conservative have never had to invest any of their general funds. You <br />obtain special assessments at 7% - 8% and City charges 1% - 3% over that <br />amount to build up a fund, and I know from my work in the County over the <br />years, that the revolving fund has made money for the cities. Expansion <br />and growth is very important. There have been a number of experiments <br />where a city, Edina for instance, was planned strictly residential, but <br />it came to a point where commercial/industrial had to be allowed for in <br />order to reach a proper tax balance for the residential areas. City also <br />has to be concerned with continued growth. Cost to maintain a young <br />development is at a minimum and the City actually makes money, 7 or 8 <br />years later the maintenance costs are incurred. I am very impressed with <br />Ramsey's approach to orderly development and urge Council to consider <br />seriously EDC's recommendations, especially Item 5b and let me assure you <br />that 5b is the most conservative policy I have ever seen. <br /> <br />C/April 26, 1983 <br /> Page 16 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />