Laserfiche WebLink
would be affected by realignment of the Burlington Northern railroad <br />tracks. <br /> <br />Council directed City Staff to contact the affected landowners and report <br />back to Council at it's next meeting with a recommendation for a special <br />meeting date to meet with those landowners regarding the proposed <br />realignment of the railroad tracks. <br /> <br />Case #15: Report On Status Of The 153rd Avenue N.W.. Railroad Crossing: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley presented copies of the stipulated agreement that has been <br />submitted to the Administrative Law Judge and entered into by all four <br />parties. The judge has acceuted the stipulations as the record which will <br />be submitted to the Department of Transportation and the Railroad <br />Regulatory Board for their respective orders. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />receive Mr. Hartley's report. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cox. <br /> <br />Case #16: Consider Requ_est Of Anoka County For Right-Of-WayAlong <br /> County Road No. 83: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that the County is making improvements to Cty. Rd. #83 <br />and a very small piece of property owned by Ramsey is needed for right-of- <br />way. <br /> <br />Motion byCouncilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Resolution #88-52 conveying City owned property to the County of <br />Anoka for use as road right-of-way for County Road No. 83. (Please refer <br />to resolution file for Resolution #88-52). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember COx. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteberg requested that Mr. Hartley contact County <br />Commissioner Haas-Steffen to encourage that anothemr public informational <br />meeting be held regarding proposed improvements to Cty. Rd. #83. <br /> <br />Case #17: _Update On Urban Service Area _Expansion: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that he and Ms. Norris have met with Metro Council to <br />discuss the expansion of Ramsey's year 2000 Urban Service Area. Met <br />Council indicated that Ramseywould have to initiate an amendment to it's <br />Comprehensive Plan. Met Council also indicated that Ramsey would have to <br />resolve it's rural density issues by setting a future date, possibly late <br />1989, when the one lot per 10 acres would be effective and enforced. <br /> <br />Council consensus was that Staff proceed with an amendment for the <br />preliminary expansion of the year 2000 Urban Service Areaand negotiate for <br />a date beyond late 1989 for enforcing the 1 unit per 10 acre rural density <br />City Council/March 22, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />