My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Charter Commission - 09/25/1986
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Charter Commission
>
1986
>
Minutes - Charter Commission - 09/25/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:22:25 PM
Creation date
4/1/2004 8:29:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
09/25/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
some time in the future, is consistent with the charter intent; in other words, <br />the assessment is for the total system and not just the immediate improvements <br />that are being constructed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter stated that he thinks the procedure is totally appropriate <br />as long as the future costs and what they are for are noted at the hearing. <br />Also, Chapter 11 of the charter requires that the city assess all costs of <br />utilities to the user; to do that, the city has to take into account all costs <br />necessary to have the system complete and operating. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is that the current process for systems costs meets the <br />intent of the charter. <br /> <br />The discussion again focused on the 10% over estimate requirement for a one <br />year postponement or cancellation of project and Mr. Hartley noted that the <br />State statute estimate override limit is set at 20%. Mr. Hartley stated that <br />with the changing market climate, the price of materials and construction <br />conditions, it is very difficult to present an estimate that will be within 10% <br />of the actual cost. Mr. Hartley inquired if the Commission feels that 10% is <br />essential to assure the public and those being assessed that nobody gives false <br />information. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka noted that construction market and conditions can vary greatly in <br />that interim between when estimates are made and the project is bid. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter agreed that 10% is a very narrow margin to stay within; <br />suggested that the estimate override be tied to the assessed cost of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Commission directed staff to draft appropriate language, for Commission review, <br />that would amend the estimate overried factor to be based on assessed cost <br />rather than project cost. <br /> <br />COMMISSION INPUT <br /> <br />Commissioner Gamec stated that he is not aware that the operational budget <br />submitted in 1985 was approved. <br /> <br />The Commission scheduled their next meeting date for Thursday, October 23, <br />1986. It was noted that the meeting minutes of April 25, 1985 and May 30, 1985 <br />should also be on the October 23 agenda for approval. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Data and seconded by Commissioner Lichter to adjourn the <br />Charter Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Sieber, Commissioners Gamec, Data, <br />Lictoer, Greenberg and Bauerkemper. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners <br />Buchanan and Titterud. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Syl¥~a Frol~k <br />Secretary <br /> <br />September 25, 1986 <br /> Page 6 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.