My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/09/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/09/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:42 AM
Creation date
5/14/2015 9:03:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/09/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Development Director Gladhill reviewed the policy questions open for Council <br />direction and asked whether staff should explore options related to Highway 47. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if the access is closed, would the City have to acquire property. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill answered in the affirmative and used a slide to point <br />out the private property that would need to be acquired for right-of-way purposes under both <br />driveway alignment options. He explained that property owner has indicated the asking price <br />would be approximately $65,000 for that parcel. <br />Councilmember Riley noted that would be to access a building the City does not intend to use <br />beyond a year or two. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that is correct; however, there are utilities in <br />that temporary access easement that would have to be relocated or abandoned. <br />Councilmember Riley stated the Park and Recreation Commission has consistently recommended <br />no City park in this project, which he supports. <br />Councilmember Johns concurred, noting the close location of Solstice Park. She stated that `park' <br />may mean a trail or other amenity. <br />Councilmember Shryock concurred. <br />Mayor Strommen stated she does not necessarily disagree with that recommendation but at this <br />point in time, the neighborhood has a lot of small children and there is no place for them to go on <br />their own. She agreed that will change over time, but felt it was worth discussion in how to provide <br />opportunities for children to have outdoor play time without a scheduled visit accompanied by an <br />adult. She asked if the Council wants to provide those opportunities or if that is being provided in <br />another way. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated she lives off Emerald Pond Park in an urban area where a lot of <br />residents, because they are busy, have their own play equipment so children play in that way. She <br />felt it was almost an automatic given that people provide their own play equipment in their yards. <br />She stated there is other infrastructure to be considered, such as trails, noting most of the proposed <br />yards will be of reasonable size and able to accommodate private play structures. Councilmember <br />Shryock felt that should suffice at this point, so she does not support requiring a dedicated City <br />park within this development. <br />Planning Commission Chair Levine stated the Planning Commission wrestled with that point and <br />came up with the same conclusion and that the Elementary School is across the street and provides <br />a larger -sized play area for younger and up through teen -aged children. He noted the school has <br />vey nice play equipment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.