My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/09/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/09/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:42 AM
Creation date
5/14/2015 9:03:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/09/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Planner Anderson stated that every request or proposal is unique and that everything cannot <br />be accounted for in an ordinance. Having flexibility and checking in with various advisory boards <br />protects the City from setting undesirable precedents. <br />Board Member Valentine stated that he felt another developer would try to take advantage of a <br />precedent if it was advantageous to them, but that checking in with the various advisory boards <br />should protect the City. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that Staff is supportive of what is being proposed in this case as <br />meeting the City's overall ordinance. He is hoping to get feedback from the Board in terms of <br />policy direction moving forward and would like direct feedback on perimeter plantings in the rear <br />yards of properties. He stated that it is Staff's opinion that it should be a stage one improvement <br />and should be the developer' s responsibility to install the trees. He is seeking feedback from the <br />Board on Staff's recommendation that excluding the two front yard trees, the remainder of the <br />plantings be the responsibility of the developer as a stage one improvement. He is seeking a <br />motion to recommend that the landscaping and tree preservation plans are acceptable. <br />Board Member Lewis would like to get additional feedback on the recommendation. He would <br />like to take a look additional plantings at the perimeter to avoid it being mowed grass and to make <br />sure that these plantings are part of the original plan. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that Staff is open to additional plantings around the perimeter. He <br />stated that the City' s engineering staff would have to determine that the plantings would not cause <br />any additional maintenance issues. <br />Board Member Lewis stated that his intention is not to interfere, but to enhance the area. <br />Motion by Board Member Valentine and seconded by Board Member Hiatt to recommend Option <br />1; to include Staff's recommendation that excluding the two front yard trees, the remainder of the <br />plantings be the responsibility of the developer as a stage one improvement; and to explore the <br />potential for additional plantings around the rim or perimeter of the area between Block One <br />Harvest Estates and Block One Harvest Estates Second Addition. <br />City Council Liaison LeTourneau suggested adding the recommendation that the plantings be the <br />responsibility of the developer in the phase one improvement clause also. <br />Board Member Valentine accepted that as a friendly amendment. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Stodola, Board Member Valentine, Hiatt, Bernard, and <br />Lewis. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Bentz. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.