Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Special

Home

and Column F. Communities will have their allocations adjusted upward (positive values in Columns G * Column K includes an adjustment to make all communities’ allocations sum to 37,900 units (the regional Need), so it is not the exact sum of Columns D, I, and J. 83330271710037423636311,410173150832830123- (D + I + J)* average values in Column E (indicating more Allocation income households (those with income at or below 80% of Area Median rvices with input from Council Research staff, and supplemented by Council Research estimates of average values in Column F (indicating that they import workers in low Final (K) wage jobs located within five miles of the community’s geographic center divided by the number of residents within this distance whose income households. worker 8122464366946 +54+0+2+0+10+0+17 balance(D × H) ----- Job/ ---- (J) Adjustments Numerical Housing 1528+18+92816429+2+0+32+4127+027 +155 (D × G) - stock ------- (I) - unsubsidized and publicly subsidized units. In the average sewered community, 66.4% of housing units are affordable to low worker balance 9%1%2%1%5%5%1%5%9% +8%10%13%+17%+12%+10%+12% Job/ - (H) --------- Adjustment than -- 2 - Factors wage jobs). Communities will have their allocations adjusted downward (negative values in Columns G or H) if they have higher Housing 2%8%+3%+10%6%23%15%4%+12%+15%11%+29%+5%23%18%20% stock (G) ---- ------ for All Communities (continued) ** Cities that are split between two counties are shown in the county with the largest share of households. wage jobs). 4 worker - (Avg = 0.611.051.530.990.530.351.030.800.801.981.711.601.050.810.571.76 balance than 1.08) Job/ - Measures for (F) - Housing stock affordability: The percentage of a community’s total housing units that is affordable to low Adjustments - average values in Column F (indicating that they export workers in low average values in Column E (indicating less affordable housing) or higher Housing (Avg = 66.4%) 3 68.4%77.3%62.8%53.5%74.3%95.5%85.5%71.8%51.4%47.7%81.0%29.2%59.8%95.7%90.1%92.4% stock (E) of Appendix B. wage job. In the average sewered community, the ratio is 1.08. allocation adjusted (C×33.5%) 9373356529445234357021,3381331108031170134 - Source: Draft forecasts developed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Se (D) Pre scores based on the measures in Column E 2030 8 serviced areas. For more information, see footnote - Exhibit 5: Calculations of Total Allocations for 2021 2,8001,0001,9502801,350101,3002,1004,00040103302,4003500400 A) Summary: Sewered growth Net (C) – (B 1 Households 25,30026,90030,1505208,70027010,90016,25026,1005701205,15011,4009,35016010,000 2030 (B) Growth - 22,50025,90028,2002407,3502609,60014,15022,1005301104,8209,0009,0001609,600 Job/Worker Balance: The ratio of low METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2020 (A) - - than These numbers are rescaled Z - - affordable housing) or lower than Inver Grove Heights - or H) if they have lower Empire Township Mendota Heights -- growth in municipal South St. Paul primary job is a low Income), including West St. Paul County Apple Valley Communities Rosemount Farmington Hastings** Vermillion Burnsville Hampton LakevilleMendota Sewered | Lilydale Dakota Eagan 35 - Page 1234