Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Special

Home

scores based on the measures in Column E and Column F. Communities will have their allocations adjusted upward (positive values in Columns G it is not the exact sum of Columns D, I, and J. 3330113394191423241601452,02110611966206- (D + I + J)* average values in Column E (indicating more Allocation income households (those with income at or below 80% of Area Median estimates of age values in Column F (indicating that they import workers in low Final (K) wage jobs located within five miles of the community’s geographic center divided by the number of residents within this distance whose income households. d by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services with input from Council Research staff, and supplemented by Council Research worker 204 +22+0+0+1+1+1+22+1+20+123+4+7+3+6 balance(D × H) - Job/ - (J) Adjustments Numerical Housing +43+0+11575422+13198306+34+432 (D × G) ----- stock ---- (I) - - ffordable to low worker balance 4%5% +8%+14%+3%+25%+2%+6%+9%+2%+15%+6%+4%+6%+4%+3% Job/ - (H) -- Adjustment than 2 * Column K includes an adjustment to make all communities’ allocations sum to 37,900 units (the regional Need), so- Factors wage jobs). Communities will have their allocations adjusted downward (negative values in Columns G or H) if they have higherIncome), including unsubsidized and publicly subsidized units. In the average sewered community, 66.4% of housing units are a Housing +16%1%+9%20%12%15%21%9%+49%22%6%14%+3%3%+6%14% stock (G) ---- ------- for All Communities (continued) ** Cities that are split between two counties are shown in the county with the largest share of households. wage jobs). aver 4 worker - (Avg = 1.521.831.262.441.190.871.421.591.190.821.881.381.291.401.311.23 balance than 1.08) Job/ - Measures for (F) - Housing stock affordability: The percentage of a community’s total housing units that is affordable to low Adjustments - average values in Column F (indicating that they export workers in low average values in Column E (indicating less affordable housing) or higher Housing (Avg = 66.4%) 3 46.1%67.7%54.9%92.6%81.7%85.2%94.0%78.4%3.6%95.2%74.6%84.2%63.0%70.8%58.7%84.0% stock (E) of Appendix B. wage job. In the average sewered community, the ratio is 1.08. allocation adjusted (C×33.5%) 2710103435181723427841342,22410011760234 - (D) Pre 2030 8 serviced areas. For more information, see footnote - for 2021 810030101301,55050700802504006,650300350180700 A) Growth Summary: Sewered growth Net (C) – (B l Allocations 1 Households 4,3402,1602401,1704,77018,2505,15010,5008005,35015,500131,75011,1006,0504,75011,250 2030 (B) - Exhibit 5: Calculations of Tota 3,5302,1702101,1604,64016,7005,1009,8007205,10015,100125,10010,8005,7004,57010,550 Job/Worker Balance: The ratio of low METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2020 (A) - Source: Draft forecasts develope Z- than These numbers are rescaled - - sing) or lower than - or H) if they have lower White Bear Lake** -- Vadnais Heights growth in municipal primary job is a low Falcon Heights Ramsey County North St. Paul New Brighton Little Canada Mounds View White Bear Communities North Oaks Maplewood Lauderdale affordable hou Arden HillsSaint Paul Gem Lake Shoreview Township Roseville Sewered | 38 - Page 1234