Laserfiche WebLink
scores based on the measures in Column E and Column F. Communities will have their allocations adjusted upward (positive values in Columns G <br />* Column K includes an adjustment to make all communities’ allocations sum to 37,900 units (the regional Need), so it is not the exact sum of Columns D, I, and J. <br />410698431975733034662148210228401,443- <br />(D + I + J)* <br />dicating more <br />Allocation <br />s (those with income at or below 80% of Area Median <br />Source: Draft forecasts developed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services with input from Council Research staff, and supplemented by Council Research estimates of <br />average values in Column F (indicating that they import workers in low <br />Final <br />(K) <br />hose <br />jobs located within five miles of the community’s geographic center divided by the number of residents within this distance w <br />average values in Column E (in <br />income households. <br />worker <br />9812568961 <br />+1+0123+0+0+3+16+0 <br />balance(D × H) <br />---- <br />Job/ <br />--- <br />(J) <br />- <br />Adjustments <br />Numerical <br />Housing <br />+0+0+17+18+0+71410+332+20+0 <br />+138+173+281 <br />(D × G) <br />stock <br />--- <br />(I) <br />- <br />ffordable to low <br />worker <br />balance <br />0%0%4%8%2%7%3%7%3%5% <br />+3%12%13%+3%+6% <br />Job/ <br />- <br />(H) <br />---------- <br />Adjustment <br />than <br />-- <br />2 <br />- <br />Factors <br />wage jobs). Communities will have their allocations adjusted downward (negative values in Columns G or H) if they have higherIncome), including unsubsidized and publicly subsidized units. <br /> In the average sewered community, 66.4% of housing units are a <br />income household <br />Housing <br />0%+36%+2%+4%+14%+29%26%+26%16%4%+4%22%+8%19%+23% <br />stock <br />(G) <br />-- <br />---- <br />for All Communities (continued) <br />wage jobs). <br />4 <br />worker <br />- <br />(Avg = <br />1.221.070.401.060.390.850.650.980.680.891.270.721.430.890.81 <br />balance <br />than <br />1.08) <br />Job/ <br />- <br />Measures for <br />(F) <br />- <br />Housing stock affordability: The percentage of a community’s total housing units that is affordable to low <br />Adjustments <br />- <br />average values in Column F (indicating that they export workers in low <br />average values in Column E (indicating less affordable housing) or higher <br />Housing <br />(Avg = <br />66.4%) <br />3 <br />100.0% <br />66.6%19.9%63.6%61.0%48.1%28.7%33.1%87.5%71.9%61.1%95.2%56.0%90.4%37.2% <br />stock <br />(E) <br />of Appendix B. <br />wage job. In the average sewered community, the ratio is 1.08. <br />allocation <br />adjusted (C×33.5%) <br />400786418970592027872347714425101,238 <br />- <br />(D) <br />Pre <br />2030 <br />8 <br />serviced areas. For more information, see footnote <br />- <br />Exhibit 5: Calculations of Total Allocations for 2021 <br />12002,3501,2502,9001,77008026070023043075003,700 <br />A) <br />Growth Summary: Sewered <br />growth <br />Net <br />(C) <br />– <br />(B <br />1 <br />Households <br />1,19036016,0507,8009,7005,6503003,0301,89012,6002,4702,6809,05023028,850 <br />2030 <br />(B) <br />wage <br />- <br />1,07036013,7006,5506,8003,8803002,9501,63011,9002,2402,2508,30023025,150 <br />Job/Worker Balance: The ratio of low <br />METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />2020 <br />(A) <br />- <br />- <br />than <br />These numbers are rescaled Z <br />- <br />- <br />affordable housing) or lower <br />than <br />- <br />or H) if they have lower <br />Washington County <br />Birchwood Village <br />Heights <br />-- <br />growth in municipal <br />primary job is a low <br />Cottage Grove <br />St. Paul Park <br />Communities <br />Forest LakeMahtomedi <br />Lake ElmoOak Park <br />Woodbury <br />Stillwater <br />Newport <br />LandfallWillernie <br />Sewered <br />Oakdale <br />Bayport <br />| <br />40 <br />Hugo <br />- <br />Page <br />1234 <br /> <br />